– After the bloody terrorist attacks that took place in New Zealand, wrote New Borgerliges president, Pernille Vermund in a posting on his Facebook.
‘As islamkritiker I strongly and completely, unequivocally opposed to any form of violence and terror. Criticism of islam must be done to ensure freedom and democracy. Violence and terrorism, must never be the solution’.
– But the text, I think, is contradictory, when you compare it to back then, back in september of 2018, where she endorsed the New Civil-candidates Facebook-lookups, supporting the use of the weapons to shoot against the migrants.
so begins Rahima, – 18-year-old syrian refugee, who has been here for three and a half years and just now reading on Herningsholm high School – a letter to the nation! to take distance from violence and terror and to support the grænsevagters the past. the
Rahima is a kurd from Syria and has written extensively on the nation! the most recent time. You may remember that, Syrian refugee: a Waste of time to learn how to speak Danish (1190 comments) about the paradigm shift in Danish immigration policy – or See also: Rahima: Probably the teen that gets the most negative comments in Denmark about how it is to participate in the udlændingedebatten, and now she has written an open letter, Pernille Vermund answers below. Rahimas text continues namely as follows:
– Dear Pernille Vermund.
– How can I believe that you denounce any form of violence, when you yourself support the use of weapons to shoot against the migrants?! I urge and challenge you to answer my question!
– You will not be allowed to use the New Zealand case in your campaign just to show that you are islamkritiker and not islamhader!
– You write on your Facebook that you do not support the terror and violence, but in reality it is just your opinions that get young men to feel so much hatred against muslims. People like you are helping to polarize the population.
– You said at one point that the muslims must be inhibited in all ways, but where is your respect for freedom of religion?
– Why should a particular group is inhibited in all ways because of their religion? Where is your respect for the constitution?
– You say all the time that Denmark has a need for New Civil, but no, Pernille Vermund, Denmark has no use for a party whose members do not respect the constitution!
– Is it so hard to understand that your tone in the immigration debate is to build a decidedly fjendebillede of muslims and their faith?
– you Know what, that is the difference between me and you, Pernille Vermund?
– We will both guarantee freedom and democracy, but you believe that ‘criticism of islam must be done to ensure freedom and democracy’, and I believe that the criticism of you must be done to ensure freedom and democracy. Sentence, write Rahima, and the nation! have asked Pernille Vermund read the letter and respond. It comes here:
– Dear Rahima
– You use some words, which I never take in my mouth.
‘ I don’t hate muslims. But when I look out into the world what happens when islam don’t get resistance, but puts him through, then it is very difficult to connect the warm and positive feelings with the islamic religion and ideology.
– For wherever islam gains ground, there is a crush of freedom and democracy back. We see it happening in the Middle east, in north Africa and in Asia.
– Peace is replaced by war, and prosperity are exchanged for economic ruin for the common man, while dictators and religious leaders live in luxury.
– And I could very well understand that the relatives of the homosexuals, who are locked up or killed in the name of islam, hate your ideology, and religion.
– Or to the relatives of the apostate muslims, who find that their close and loved one is sentenced to death and beheaded for leaving islam, getting a hateful relationship with the imams and the quran-wise, that defines the laws of the countries where islam has gained power.
– It is the core of my criticism of your religion and ideology.
– If you want to pray five times a day, get your holidays in hu, submit to a man and give up your right to sexual freedom, then you can do it.
– It is your right in a free country, and to the right, I will not take from you. But islam needs no influence to have in society.
– when islam will have an influence, there is less space for freedom, to democracy and to the values we have built for the Danish society. And then it goes out of all of us who will not submit to islam.
– You call my opinions ’a fjendebillede of muslims and their faith’. It is not a fjendebillede of your faith.
– Your faith must you have in peace, just you keep it private or together with your fellow believers without having to seek influence in society.
– But I can promise you that I will defend our Danish community of values against islam.
– Girls must not be allowed to wear islamic headscarf in the school.
– The public servants should not promote islam with their religious scarf.
– Halalmad must not find their way to the nurseries, kindergartens, hospitals and public canteens and muslim free schools should not have the public support, islamic communities do not have privileges, mosques must not be placed on publicly owned lands.
– I will fight for, that islam is no influence get in our society.
– I keep a lot of my freedom and very much of Denmark. Therefore.
And so you must learn to know the difference between the entirely legitimate use of firearms that our soldiers and police is equipped with in order to ensure law and order and defend our country, and so the violence and terror that those who wish to subvert our free and safe society, availing themselves of.
– If it is necessary, the border police, of course, use firearms against people, threatening them on their life to climb our borders.
– It is why they have got the weapons handed over.
– It is not violence. It is not terror. It is the defense. The defense of our country. The defense of our freedom – both your, and my, ends Pernille Vermund, but what are you thinking?