The Conservative Party has always been an advocate for lifting the revisionspligten. In his time there was trade and industry minister Bendt Bendtsen, who removed it, and since Brian Mikkelsen as the minister of trade has been to relax the requirements further.
Erhvervsordfører Mona Juul, however, is in no way dismissive a tightening.
– of course, We must make sure that there are not scams. But just in connection with hjælpepakkerne you could just see that people are getting a little too inventive. So the attention we should have. But there must be a balance in terms of how much they burden small businesses. We must go hard after the fraudsters, and at the same time, ensure that one can run a business without using extremely many revisorpenge.
See also: the First time in 14 years: the Minister will tighten up
– But it is also often the smaller companies that cheat? I have f.ex. found several cases where the directors have clearly made up accounts in order to be able to commit kreditbedrageri. And some have cheated in tax and vat.
make no mistake. I like revisorpåtegninger. But maybe you just need to modulate them. For such a some errors will be easy to discover for an accountant. Without to put me on something, then you have to look at some different models. If you use the same models over all, so it can become very heavy.
fraud cases without audit Past day Progressed to Dubai and left a bill of 12 million. day Small construction company went in 0: Got suddenly 5 million. in excess Past day Svindelmistænkte directors relax for the police
– So you want to be with to tighten up a bit?
– I’m at least positive over to look at it, because it is just a development in this area.
– Seen in retrospective, there have been too lenient requirements?
– No, I just think things evolve. Everything is on edge, and you need to discover where one begins to see the holes.
– There have been two major hvidvasksager recently collected a half a billion dollars. Where the companies, which have been used, have opted out of the review. What do you think of it?
– It really gives food for thought. It must simply be looked at it. I’m totally with, but for now let us just think us good about, so we do not make some rules, that provide extremely high costs.
In 2006, revisionspligten repealed for a large number of smaller companies. Thus, it was no longer a requirement that their accounts would be audited by an independent auditor.
the Aim was to reduce the administrative burdens for companies, which could also get rid of the bill to an accountant. Vice-versa, the public no longer any warning, if a company f.ex. could be close to bankruptcy.
In 2011, eased further on the requirements. If a company’s turnover was under eur 8 million. kr. and the number of employees does not exceed 12, you could f.ex. get rid of review. Previously, the limit was for the circulation of 3 million. kr.
155.000 companies excluded in the 2018 revision, according to figures from the CSF. 60.000 companies have completely opted out of the revisorbistand to f.ex. to set up the accounts.
Read more articles about the case here Past day Bogus for millions: 155.000 companies release control Past day Convicted storsvindler: How to exploit the criminals auditor-rule Past day OPT-out 3 Says goodbye to 500 bank customers for new requirements Past day OPT-out 4 the First time in 14 years: the Minister will tighten up Past day OPT-out 5 – It really gives food for thought Read all of the articles in Ekstra Bladet
