Ann-Charlotte MarteusLäs more columns of the:
Ann-Charlotte MarteusFölj
it had been left with no other choice than to put the now-world-famous volunteers of the Swedish coronastrategin, type statsvetarnestorn, Olof Petersson, the ROTOR of the Debate. Communicable diseases act from 2004, the only you can help them.
How true it is, that is to say, how much space Video: and FHM actually, I can’t tell. However, the commission of inquiry in 1999, which was the basis for the new law, is, indeed, fascinating reading, in a world of lockdowns, and the karantänböter in the background.
There is a single, infected human welfare is at the heart of the commission’s concerns. The investigator acknowledges that the purpose of disease prevention, the true is that the ”protection of the population against infectious diseases, and is not the primary focus, to care for the individuals who are affected by a disease.” But, still, it is for the individual who’s heart leaps.
It’s because of her that the ”smittskyddsarbetet need to be anchored in a humanistic view of human beings,” and to take into account the individual’s dignity and self-determination. When the use of force and intimidation but dialogue and support.
Hiv and received in a housing of the special position among communicable diseases, and the so-called ” bastuklubbarna later.
No, it’s the individual carriers to which the investigating officer had in the year 1999 was the hiv-positive people. And then you realize, with even the commission’s focus is on humanism, freedom, equality, and tolerance.
in Sweden, took the draconian measures in the 1980s, homophobic poison aidspanik. Hiv and received in a housing of the special position among communicable diseases, and the so-called ” bastuklubbarna was no evidence that they were smittdrivande.
in 1999, the eftertankens kranka as clearly set out. The investigating officer had identified what tvångsisolerats, with the support of the old communicable diseases act: It is focused almost entirely on hiv-positive people, and focused mainly on the ”socially vulnerable people such as drug addicts or people with mental illness, and if the people of a foreign origin.”
They have a right to be, without the intent, of course, to walk around and infect others.
The smittskyddslag in 2004, was, by the parliament was more teeth than that of the investigating officer concerned; the possibilities for the application of coercive measures is not. However, voluntary participation is the core theme.
the first paragraph in the section entitled ”General guidelines for the smittskyddet” is basically lifted directly from the commission of inquiry: ”Smittskyddsåtgärder should be based on science and proven experience, and must not be more extensive than what is justifiable. This action shall be taken with due respect for the equal worth of all people and the rights of the individuals to privacy.”
< Olof Persson says the new communicable diseases act provides that the state changed the view of people. Instead of being an object of governmental action, was a citizen, a subject which is entrusted with the responsibility and sole discretion.
You can also say that it has a lot of development. The rights of the individual and the integrity of the accounts of the centre and the consequences on the collective level, are some of the other hand. An example of this is the phenomenon that has come to the fore during a pandemic, relating to people with dementia. They are not allowed to be closed in for privacy reasons, even if they are covidsmittade. They have a right to be, without the intent, of course, to walk around and infect others.
READ MORE: is the Political stupidity of the elderly can die from the corona, in vain. READ MORE: Search cheaters on the test
