the Aftermath on the minister of education Merete riisager’s (LA) interrupted visit at Ørestad Gymnasium rolls on.
Thursday, undervisningsordfører in the Alternative, Carolina Magdalene Maier, summoned the minister to the consultation.
In the beginning of march, cut off the minister of education Merete Riisager (LA) and the parish priest Kathrine Lilleør suddenly their visit to Ørestad Gymnasium due to heckling and, allegedly threatening behavior from students.
Ørestad Gymnasium made a statement for the incident, where they found the basis to punish any students.
on Wednesday, wrote Berlingske tidende, that the Board of Education and Quality (STUCCO) had gone into the matter.
the Agency criticized Ørestad Gymnasies handling of the incident and called for the management reconsidered and either punish individual students or collectively.
Just STUCCO’s handling of the case has been undervisningsordfører Carolina Magdalene Maier (Y) up out of the chair:
– It is that they repeatedly put pressure on the board and do not recognize management’s assessment that there is no occasion to sanction students, she says to Ritzau.
According to the rapporteur, the gymnasiets ledelsesret even to assess whether there are grounds to punish the students. Since the agency belongs under the Ministry of education, it is Merete Riisager, who hauled in the consultation.
STUCCO writes the inverted in their assessment that the Ørestad Gymnasiums management has a duty to sanction students who violate the studio and rules of conduct by shouting epithets, for example.
on Thursday night, wrote Berlingske, that both management and teachers at Ørestad Gymnasium refuse to follow the STUCCO’s instructions, either on a collective or individual sanctions against students.
– You can’t punish a 1,200 pupils, because there maybe are a few who have behaved badly, says gymnasiets chairman of the board René van Laer to Berlingske.
Gymnasiets original assessment is based, according to the newspaper on a review of videos from the visit.
Here, it has been established that it is not possible to identify the students who shouted epithets after the minister.