Between sniffandet and gurglandet are written it frantically. When I clink in the glass and collect the papers I discover to my great joy, that they wrote small short stories. Instead of dreary and academic smaknoteringar I read personal little stories with lots of passion between the lines. Why do I myself not so here?
to all who are studying wine, learn to assess the beverage according to an objective and methodical analysis. You describe the wine’s appearance, aroma and taste without own values. The downside is that the description is general and extremely boring to read. ”Very fruity taste with hints of barrel, hints of black currant, blackberry, herbs, coffee and vanilla. Served dishes of lamb or beef.” The description comes from the Monopoly and could, in principle, be able to apply for all of the most popular red wines less.
Read more: A new way to describe the drinks.
There is really no sensible reason to describe wine with references to other fruits and berries. Aroma and taste is very individual. Not to slentrianrekommendera a certain type of animal that would fit.
guaranteed contributed to this stagnant fikonspråket. Although I tried to avoid stereotypical depictions I’ve definitely got readers to browse further, or become indignant, that when I once referred to the wet lovikkavantar and grandmother’s bathroom cabinet. The question is what would happen if I did that, the students in Grythyttan? Where, when, how, and with whom? I am testing.
Read more about wine
