just stumbled across an article from 2015, Extra Magazine’s Facebook page.
– It deals with a Russian man who was drugged by a woman he had met during a trip to the city and subsequently removed his testicles.
It turned out that the woman was in a gang of organtyve.
so begins Andrew’s an op-ed on the way, violence will be annotated on the net. Andreas seems namely one can trace a good deal of hypocrisy in the way violence against women is being commented on – and the way violence against men does. His post which you can share on Facebook, continues namely as follows:
– A lot of Facebook users (including many women) cheered and amused by the man’s situation in the comments box. Really quite scary that people can sit and gloat that a random man traumatiseres for life.
– But at the same time illustrates also very well the people’s hypocrisy. For there had been talk about a female victim, yes so had the reactions, without doubt, had quite a different character.
– So would the fun be replaced by indignation and anger, and people would have liked the torture, death and mutilation of the perpetrators.
– Furthermore, there were also several that defended the incident on the grounds that the man (who was married) while I was out of it because he was trying to make Onwin a digression with the woman before she stunned him.
– F. ex. wrote Rikke E to: ‘So it goes all the unfaithful men’.
– another female user by the name of Miti’s wrote that: ’the Man just could have been his wife faith, then it was not happened to him’. A point of view which was shared by many of the other users in the comments.
– Aha, interesting way of looking at things. So if a woman is the husband or boyfriend cheating, so she deserves well also to get piling the abdomen up, or what? Or apply it only one way?
– Now some will surely ask why I choose to take as a starting point a three year old story from Russia? Because this type of reaction from people is far from an isolated case.
– I have read several stories of the same kind from other places in the world, which also has prompted similar reactions from people. Yes, it is almost customary to mock and ridicule innocent men as being maltrakteret.
– Moreover, had the responses been large the the same, if there had been talk of a Danish man. Because it is the general perception people have on men who are exposed to violent crimes.
– But try, instead, to express publicly about f.ex. rape and you will quickly end up in a gigantic shitstorm.
– I can remember when the then 16-year-old Ebrahim S. a few years ago wrote a letter to the editor in which he pointed out that women should not go in low cut clothing or move around alone at night, if they want to avoid rape.
the Post quickly became a major topic of conversation and many were outraged by Ebrahims views. B. la. he received several death threats.
– Several of the nation’s largest media chose to cover case, and a number of politicians were also out and condemn the Ebrahims opinions.
– At no point in his speech defended Ebrahim rape or mocking victims of rape, but merely pointed out that women should also take some precautions when moving out in the nightlife.
– One may agree or disagree with his views, but it is striking how much controversy and stir the post created, especially considering that no one seems it is a trace strange, to several hundred danes at the same time can sit and think that it fat and in order to a man without cause will get cut the penis or testicles.
– the Next time there is any as the blabber up on how women at home are suppressed and looked down on, so they should have just taken a look at the article and the associated comments.
What you can conclude is that the danes find violence against innocent people despicable, but only if there is talk about women. Has the victim on the other hand, Y-chromosome, so he can damn well just learn it. I break off in your hypocrisy.
– Where is the equality henne, writes Andreas, but what do you think – does he have a point?
