GARDERMOEN/OSLO (Dagbladet): Thursday was a day for the history books: The first non-socialist flertallsregjeringen since 1985 was formed, and Knut Arild Hareide resigned as the leader of the Sector.
Yet there was the man who is the favorite to take over after Hareide Kjell Britain Ropstad, who stole the attention.
In the regjeringsplattformen, KrF, Left, Right, and Frp agreed, curtailed the right to fosterreduksjon of healthy embryos, so – called tvillingabort. The new government will thus become the first since abortloven was introduced in 1976 which reduces the Norwegian women’s right to self-determination.
About a quarter of an hour out in the meeting, which was broadcast on NRK, Ropstad challenged on this by Jonas Gahr Støre.
In the end of a long process of reasoning he says that the consequence of the innskrenkningen is that we will get more abortions, and argues that women who, for various reasons say that they are not able to carry forward both the embryo should have the choice of whether to abort one, instead of both.
GOES BY: Hareide resigns as party leader This after regjeringsforhandlingene with the Right, the Left and the Progress party. Video: Kristoffer Løkås Show more Sjokkutspillet
Støre is then interrupted by the presenter Fredrik Solvang, which gives the word back to Ropstad.
But the main point is that I believe that if you are able to carry forward one, then you should also be able to carry forth two, says Ropstad.
Immediately take the Store up the index finger and races:
– you Should determine it? he says.
you Must decide it, Kjell Britain Ropstad? It should the woman decide. It is what it is historic in our law.
– It grabs you in as a political high priest and says that we shall determine. It is a violation of the law, and it is very serious.
“Krøkkete” said
the Newspaper failed to get a comment from Kjell Britain Ropstad after the Debate. But Friday morning set Ropstad on Nrk’s political quarter. Here, he is confronted with this measure her from the debate.
– It was very “krøkkete” said. My points is that we must facilitate for the families. I think that if one really wants to carry forward one child, we must as a society be able to facilitate that you are able to carry forward two, ” he says.
But if the woman thinks otherwise, we shall not listen to that woman?, ask the Radio show host.
– Professional recommendation is simply of the fear that if you take the abortion of one child, can the risk that the other child dies will be so great that one should not do it. So I think there is a moral perspective about it. When you look at the knowledge you can get, for example, what gender it is, it can in worst case be a selection based on gender. That you choose away the boy or the girl, and I think that’s ethically problematic, respond Ropstad.
After the political quarter of the ask VG about Ropstad will go so far as to apologise for this measure.
– Yes, I see that I should have chosen other words to get out that which was the point, he replies.
Give up, go in the government Comment Raged on Twitter
Støre is, however, not the only one who has responded to Ropstads overtures. Throughout the night and have “Ropstad” been among the most talked about on Twitter in the Uk. The only thing that has been more discussed is “#nrkdebatt”.
hundreds of Twitter users have thrown themselves on, and uttered his opinion. Some have been angry, others have made jokes about it.
– And hey presto – In two seconds managed Ropstad to get many more to be positive to self-determined tvillingabort. Is also pretty sure that Knut Arild Hareide would never have managed to reel off such a thing, writes a user.
Ropstad provides marerittdebut a face, writes another.
Therefore, the new government in Norway of Humour
Dagbladet commentator Marie Simonsen chose a more humorous twist in his reaction to Ropstads overtures.
– are you Able to replace a party leader, are you able to switch the two, she writes in a Twitter message.
– are you Able to bear a duty free, can you carry the four, she writes in another.
What is it you stand there and say?!? ask your member of parliament and the fiscal spokesperson for the SV, Kari Elisabeth Kaski, on Twitter.
Presenter Fredrik Solvang also saw their chance to have fun on the Ropstads expense after the debate.
– Where are Olaug Bollestad, Fredrik Solvang? Is it not partilederdebatt? asked one user on Twitter.
– if you Ask me, I ask you. Ropstad showed up only, black Solvang the night of Friday.
Also on Facebook
Also on Facebook, debate has raged after the Newspaper shared the first article about this measure. In the course of the night, it has been added again almost a hundred comments in which it expressed dissatisfaction in many of them.
A few takes, however, the same.
– it Is none of you that think of the child? writes a Facebook user.
Absolutely true. Agree with Ropstad in this. I vote not This, but abortion should not be contraceptive, writes another.
the Opposition frustrated
Shortly after the meeting, told the SV leader Audun Lysbakken to the newspaper Dagbladet that he dislikes very strongly the way prime minister Erna Solberg and Kjell Britain Ropstad argues.
– I think many are tired of this høystemte ethical reasoning from Solberg and Ropstad. I think you should think thoroughly about before discussing a few families ‘ deeply personal choice.
They set themselves to court over some very few families, said Lysbakken.
– Insensitive, and ignorant, wrote the Labour party’s Self-Kjerkol in the health and omsorgskomiteen in Parliament in a text message to the Newspaper.
– As to be thrown back to the 50’s
