refugees should continue to be prescribed of residence, and this will now apply indefinitely. A permanent residency requirement agreed on by the Cabinet. This makes for criticism.
knew The Federal government that they would bring in criticism with their plans, the resident attribute to circulation in the long term. Therefore, Eleonore Petermann, the spokesperson for the Federal government stressed the interior Ministry, how much support there is. The vast majority of the countries and the local associations wanted to continue to stick to this regulation, says Petermann.
The residency requirement had been introduced in the 2016 first for a limited period, to control the distribution of hundreds of thousands of refugees. The Ministry of interior praises the support for recognised beneficiaries of protection as a successful instrument of Integration that can do for the Länder and local authorities planning security.
Pro: No Metropolitan, but Integration
in Principle, the Refugees in the province, in the asylum of the delivery method must have three years of residence. Within the provinces, then further residency requirements can be made. To prevent that immigrants bales in certain cities and parallel societies. About half of the länder.
Helmut Dedy, managing Director of the German Association of cities argued, you need a way to control, so the cities that were greatly affected would not be overwhelmed by the refugee influx. It was a matter of integration, therefore, they wanted to retain the residency requirement.
critics see in the permanent edition of the seat of an intervention in the freedom of movement and a violation of EU law.
cons: engaging in free movement, in breach of EU law
Ulla Jelpke from the left party criticized the plans to the ARD-capital Studio sharp, speaks of an intervention in the freedom of movement. Here will clearly be in breach of the Geneva Convention on refugees and against EU law, says Jelpke. Refugees have the right to seek work there or to live there, where you have friends or relatives, and where you feel comfortable.
cons: violence, protection for women in danger
the German women lawyers Federation has concerns. Dorothee Frings sees the actually guaranteed protection from Violence for women through the residential pad seat significantly hampered, if it were to abuse refugee women in need of help. Women with a residency requirement could not be absorbed into women’s homes, if these homes are outside the district.
The SPD announced it is about this point in the forthcoming deliberations in the Bundestag again to talk. The Federal government has rejected the concerns, the Ministry of justice explained that the bill was, of course, been already tested on its constitutionality.
the Federal Cabinet wants to}permanent residence obligation for refugees
Sabine Müller, HR
27.02.2019 15:53 PM
We offer this Audio in the following formats for Download:
mp3 Ogg Vorbis
note: , If the audio file is not saved when you Click automatically, you can select click with the right mouse button and “save target as…”.
