NPD, and III. is not allowed to use multiple posters in the European election campaign. Urgency of the extreme right-wing parties before the constitutional court were rejected.
The Federal constitutional court has rejected two of the Urgency of the NPD and the extreme right-wing micro-party, The third way against the removal of election posters.
The NPD wanted to achieve that in Zittau, three from the city of removed election posters with the inscription “Migration kill” for the European election campaign will be immediately suspended again at the old sites. The party of The third way wanted to commit the city of Chemnitz, away posters with the inscription “Multiculturalism kills” immediately re-attach.
The city administrations, had the posters on suspicion of sedition slimming.
Right-wing have failed with an application for a temporary injunction in election poster dispute before the constitutional court.
decision, not required
in view of the small number of only three remote NPD posters in Zittau, a short-term decision of the Federal constitutional court is not necessary, it was said to the grounds for the decision. The disadvantage for the party was low, the court explained. The output of any possible proceedings would be open.
There are doubts as to the viability of the administrative decisions, there were, however, the Federal constitutional court informed. There is considerable doubt that the word kills, according to the slogan “Migration would convey” to the unprejudiced observer the impression that all foreigners or migrants are to be regarded as potential perpetrators of homicides.
This assessment is ignored, that of the sentence standing in the context of an election campaign and, in the abstract, the perceived consequences of Migration to the attention of wool, it said. This is a blanket discrediting of all migrants, could not justify the administrative court decisions viable.
The application of the micro-party The III. against the city of Chemnitz was rejected for formal reasons. The application of the party does not comply with the requirements of a justification of a Eilantrags, it said.
