it Would be the armed fools seriously with the inclusion of the topic in the Constitution, it would be locker is a compromise. But the bickering is detrimental to the democracy.
comment by Wolfgang Wittl
the essence of democracy is that parties argue with each other. So the points of are distinct. Voters learn through the struggle to the better arguments, who stands for what Position and whom is it worthwhile to support. Grotesque is a dispute, if the parties in your destination are United and still, glare at, as it is currently witnessed in the farcical spectacle for the inclusion of climate protection in the Bavarian Constitution.
CSU and the Free voters, which are not noticed in the past few years, as environmental activists, want to give the climate protection as soon as possible in the Constitution. The greens and the SPD had precisely requested the same, are suddenly against it. You and the CSU have swapped their positions in only a few months – not because he would have converted one to the other successfully, but only out of party-tactical considerations. Therefore, this dispute not for the sake of democracy, it is to their damage.
The game for the agreement would be as big as all nature conservation areas in the free state, but no party is ready, only a Millimeter. Must be included in the climate protection already in may in the Constitution, as the government wants it? Must be written by individual measures, in fact, right now, in the law, such as the greens and the SPD, the demand? It would be the dispute seriously fools with the issue of climate protection, it would be locker is a compromise.
In truth, the parties engage in a struggle to the Environmental authority. The Söder-CSU wants to be green; how strong the colour is true, but only define it for yourself. The Greens, meanwhile, want to not let the reputation as an Eco-party number one ramponieren. If it is to be done in Bavaria to the nature reserve of something, then only after, the green style. The population, which has just signed up to hundreds of thousands for more protection of species, is not the to convey. You want solutions, not a small-minded banter.
