Police seized the army in the service of a special officer of the house of the seven firearms.Shotguns, rifles and revolvers were found in the bedroom and living room – one of the revolver was in the kitchen cupboard.The armory was revealed when the military person’s home, alerted the police.The armed forces special officer was convicted. Eriika Ahopelto
the armed forces in the service of a special officer has been convicted of firearms-aserikkomuksesta and explosives offence to a fine of Päijät-Häme district court.
police patrol had been alerted military personnel home to find out family. At the same time the police investigate a man’s home and find there a total of seven guns.
Rifles and shotguns were sleeping and in the living room and the other revolver was in the kitchen cupboard. He doesn’t have the provisions of the weapons lockers.
according to the Prosecution, a special officer was intentionally or gross negligence, otherwise than temporarily, retained the seven firearm and guilty of this firearms aserikkomus.
the Same private property in the garage had a freezer on the top of the storage tin box, electric teddy bears. In addition, a private house in the closet was half a kilo of gunpowder.
Authorised weapons
Materials would have required the prosecutor of the lockers. Explosives storage the second indictment charges a crime. Man there was a permit agent of preservation.
the Police had taken special officer caught up last at the end of November, at midnight, the investigation for three days.
the military men had weapons permits, and he described them preserved at home only occasionally due to hunting.
Police seized a home alarm connection to find the weapons. The Päijät-Häme district court sentenced about 45-year-old special officer of the firearms aserikkomuksesta and explosive crime 25 a day fine. Fine makes 625 euros.
the Police will make their own at the discretion of the seized weapons permits, court matter was not dealt with.
the special officer against the driven prosecution service of the crime, which was also another military person as the respondent, was dismissed. Thing was about the military cartridge of the surrender of another person.
