they Wanted to bring their public criticism of the new Federal asylum centre (BAZ) as a candidate for the city’s Bureau into the conversation?
no, definitely not. I have represented in the municipal Council that attitude only, which I represent always.
The state Secretariat for Migration (SEM) in the operation of the BAZ Duttweiler not to the recommendations of the anti-torture Commission. Can accept the city?
The relationship between anti-torture Commission and the SEM, I can’t judge. We have built up our attitude to a suitable Security system due to their own experience. We have created reports, with our staff speaking and in the municipal Council negotiated. This attitude I have maintained a constant.
It is not recommended to search children and young people systematically or to allow the Carrying of food.
If this is the attitude of the anti-torture Commission, I agree to you completely.
A former security guard of the test operation Juch said in the NZZ, this centre was used by criminal gangs as a hub for stolen goods and drugs. These searches are correct?
security issues there are in all asylum centres again and again. There has been a Phase, in fact, a group in the centre with the drug has acted. It was the police. If one finds that a gang is on the Site, is informed the police, who then takes over the Lead.
you, or the asylum-organisation Zürich (AOZ) Have concealed the abuses of the system?
We have never concealed anything. There was no miss. In such incidents the police were involved, according to the Protocol. The AOZ has worked closely with the police, and the division of tasks was clear. The security was accommodation to the Juch-Area will never be a greater Problem than in other Collectives.
is it True that the security man was dismissed because he wanted to consistently enforce house rules?
To the grounds of termination, I have to take for reasons of personal and data protection in Detail, of any comments. It is clear, however, that there were great differences about how the security regime on the Juch-should the Area be implemented.
you are with the SEM in the conversation. What points do you want to improve?
Basically it’s about these people in a place, where you feel as welcome. It is a question of which room the question of security in the everyday lives of the people it occupies. Since we are of the view that we need to follow a pragmatic Regime like in the test center Juch.
What does this all mean?
in addition to a more pragmatic security regime shears can also relate to things like the interior. At this time, the BAZ still no home. We need to change. Especially given that the people are already in a difficult way. The much-quoted comparison with the ice-hockey Match is lagging in many respects. Because I decide voluntarily whether or not I go to the stadium and to me the controls to throw or not. For the asylum seekers, however, the center for a certain amount of time your home is.
Created: 21.11.2019, 22:22 PM
