the Appeal against Eirik Jensen and Gjermund Cappelen in the Borgarting court of appeal goes towards the end.

yesterday was the ten jurors who will determine whether Eirik Jensen is guilty or not transported to a separate room in the Borgarting court of appeal for rådslagningen.

Lagdommer Kristel Heyerdahl encouraged during his rettsbelæring that the jurors discussing the case at 09 to 15. After this recommend is New that they travel home.

midst of the Fire: – The only thing we can do now is to wait

Annicken S. Michaelsen, adviser in the Borgarting court of appeal, says to Dagbladet that there has not been any direct contact between the fagdommerne and the jury about the time commitment and working hours.

– the Advice lagdommer Heyerdahl gave rettsbelæringen about working hours is only intended as an indicative recommendation, she writes in an e-mail to Dagbladet.

At 15.03 yesterday was the Newspaper, however, witnesses to the fact that three of the Jensen-jury members, including the mayor, left the rettslokalet in the Borgarting court of appeal, suggesting that they have chosen to follow Heyerdahl solicitation.

Behind these doors is determined Jensens fate: – Poor, poor people – Totally texas

This is a different practice than the way it has been adapted for the lack of counsel in other major criminal cases. Both in the Orderud and Nokas-case was the jurors sheltered until the decision was taken.

Orderud case went over ten weeks in 2002 in Eidsivating court of appeal. Then the jury would retire to discuss the issue of guilt, they were transported to the police college in Aston.

SET IN the ORDERUD-JURY: Terje Berg is glad that they were shielded. Photo: Photo: Knut Fjeldstad Show more

They were transported from behind out of the Åråsen stadium, where the appellate court was held. It was run detours to grimsby town and the police set up fake check that no one was to follow the car with the jurors.

We were completely sheltered, locked up at the police college. We had no communication with anyone around us. Not tv or radio. It was also not possible for us to call home. The home had a number for emergencies, it was the only thing, ” says Bob Berg, one of the jurors.

He tells, however, that the Newspaper managed to find out where the jurors were and stood with a telephoto lens out on a field.

It was totally texas. We had bråpakke and managed not to eat because the press got to know about that we should go. Therefore, we had to take detours, ” he says.

ORDERUD-JURY: at the Back from left: Terje Berg, Karin Støtterud, Hilde Kristin Dahl, Randi Hertzenberg, Ingrid Johanne Nymoen, Sveinung Trømborg. Front: Jury chairman Arill Bråthen, Kjell Arne Melby, Eldrid K. Forsmo, Bjørnar Normann, Tore Wollum and Berit Hvidsten. Photo: Hans Arne Vedlog / Dagbladet Show more Recognize themselves

Berg is, however, clear that he thinks it was a good way to do it.

the Job itself is very lonely. You have no one to talk with this about than the other jurors. It is to be shielded was very easy. It was the ones we should relate to anyway and there was no interference.

– do you Think that the Jensen-jury release cheap away?

– No, I did not react on it.

He explains, however, that he recognize themselves in the extensive job Jensen-the jury are now facing.

It is about to do to know as much as possible. Everything should be sorted, and what has happened in the auditorium shall be assumed. It is a little difficult when the world around us, both visible and audible all the time. It would be hard to turn up a newspaper without seeing something about the Jensen case.

LIVE: Wait here – the jury has retired, and now Jensen’s fate is decided. The ruling will get you on the Dagbladet TV. Show more – is not Being sheltered at home

another jury member in the Orderud case, Eldrid Kristin Forsmo, describing the situation such as the Berg, and says that they just about had to escape from the outside world.

– It worked well to be sheltered on the way. You were not exposed to mas. All that was there was a part of the jury. You are not shielded when you are at home. People can call on, and the spouse can ask for things, ” she says.

They sat for almost two days before they presented the ruling in the Orderud case, but when they sat and discussed before they went to bed. Forsmo says that she was left with around 1,000 A4 pages with notes.

So we were sheltered, was it effective. During the case tried all to get something out of me. I had to be so fierce. It is easier when you are not prone to masing, ” she says.

NOKAS-JURY: To the left adjudication committee’s chairperson Henning Aastvedt. Furthermore, the set Ellen Cathrine Grøndal, Sigve Tengesdal, Bjarne Dagestad, Frøydis M. Rasmussen, Tore Jørpeland, Evy A. Karlsen, Eva Bugge Ness Nergård, Reidar Lindeland, Reed Fields, Slettebø, Nordal Magne Torstensen and Evy Ann Seldalen in the jury. Photo: Erling Hægeland / Dagbladet Show more Stayed in the hotel

Freydis Margaret Rasmussen set in the Nokas-the jury in the 71 days in 2006, and was also one of the jurors that were picked out to be with during sentencing. The first thing she says when Dagbladet call about Jensen case, is:

– I feel with them. Poor them. It is a serious job that should be done.

– FEEL WITH JENSEN-the JURY: Freydis Margaret Rasmussen feel sorry for Jensen-the jury. Photo: Alf Ove Hansen Show more

Also Nokas-the jury was sheltered, and lodged at the Atlantic Hotel in Stavanger, norway during rådslagningen. Where they sat in a closed department. In addition pendlet Rasmussen from Adelaide to Stavanger to participate in the court, and was thus much away from the family during the actual rettsbehandlingen.

– It is exhausting to sit in a jury. For me, it was tough to be torn away from work and family . I had just become a grandmother, so I had to be away every week in a half years.

She is still very clearly that it is to be sheltered under the rådslagningen was very correct.

– Jensen or Cappelen talks false the Last time

When the jury finally answer “yes” or “no” if Eirik Jensen is guilty, does it happen for the last time. Jensen-the jury is in fact the second last.

Juryordningen was basically discontinued 1. January 2018. But the cases that were scheduled before 2018, have still been processed under the old scheme.

Juryordningen was introduced in Norway in 1887, and the Parliament made the formal decision to liquidate it in 2017. All new cases in the court of appeal should now be determined by the composite court with two legal lagdommere and five lekdommere that jointly determines all the questions the case raises.

Jurymedlemmenes history: This waiting Jensen-the jury Dagbladet Plus