Smittetrykket with coronavirus in Denmark has risen and is later determined to 1.0.
It writes the Danish Health and medicines authority in a report.
2. June was smittetrykket estimated to be 0.7, but has stabilized around 1,0, says the report.
however, There are uncertainties calculated with the calculations of smittetrykket.
the Dataset included in the calculations, is so small, that there is an increased uncertainty in the figure.
It also means, to even get nyindlæggelser can get smittetrykket to move above 1.0.
Smittetrykket is calculated from the number of nyindlæggelser. You have chosen to figure out from the admissions, because they are considered to be less affected by changes of how many and who to test.
Smittetrykket is an expression for how many others a person infected with coronavirus in the average is transmitted.
Located smittetrykket of 1.0 is the term for a person with coronaviruses, on average, infect another person.
1.0 is the critical limit for smittetrykket. Is it under, is the term for the epidemic subsides.
Is it over, is the term for the epidemic accelerates.
According to Jens Lundgren, professor of communicable diseases at Rigshospitalet in copenhagen, the numbers are now so small for the admissions in Denmark to even get nyindlæggelser will be able to get smittetrykket to increase significantly.
– There is nothing dangerous in this. It is an indication that the infection is very low.
– I think you must start to keep up with to use concepts such as smittetryk for current. Right now it is fine to have 1.0 in the smittetryk. There is much more peace now, than there was 1. may, for example, says Jens Lundgren.
Smittetrykket is one of the indicators, the authorities keep an eye out in connection with the reopening of Denmark
In the overall risk assessment in the report from the national board of Health reads it, however, that smitteniveauet in Denmark in general is very low.
Smittetrykket has several times been the subject of debate.
Earlier it emerged that the calculations of the smittetrykket in the beginning of the epidemic have proved to be too high and have been revised downwards, after you have gained new and more accurate data.