The White house in America recruits. For a new promostunt is looking for scientists who do not join the scientific consensus about climate change. The job description? The recent scientific report on climate change to refute.
The handful of scientists will be the “Presidential Commission for Klimaatveiligheid”, part of the National Security council (NSC), replaced. While the original purpose of the Presidential Commission was to address climate change as a contemporary security threat, the new group would be the exact opposite. the
Conflicting outcome
As is clearly to be read in a leaked memo from the White House that the hired scientists the recent climate report – in which the people as a major cause of climate change is referred to – must be subject to a “conflict of peer review”. Scientific can have such a peer review, however, are not as one in advance, determines that the outcome is contradictory to the scientific consensus of the klimaatbeoordeling.
Read also Warms CO2 is the climate really? (and even three tight questions that climate sceptics often argue)
Klimaatbeoordeling
The endorsed report was published already in november 2018, and was even ‘ordered’ by the Trumps of administration. In the climate report includes, among other things, to read that “the consequences and costs of climate change can already be felt in the United States”. And the conclusion is that events such as the extreme weather conditions “are increasingly linked to the global warming caused by man”.
Because the president did not agree with the outcome, prevented his government that the negative klimaatbeoordeling to the big clock was hung by the report just after Thanksgiving to publish.
Trumps administration is doing now, however, still a scoop on top and wants the report fully questioned. In this way can Trump the Democrats countered offer when they see the negative klimaatbeoordeling again cite as an argument for the introduction of environmentally-friendly initiatives.
