There are things that all agree is good, and yet is surrounded by the so very tedious bureaucracy that, in practice, impossible. This applies not least in the climate and environmental context, and not least the solar cells.
It is a very effective kind of green energy, which lowers electricity bills significantly. A profit on all the way, with other words, and demand is huge.
the beginning: According to estimates, the sun has the potential to account for 14 per cent of Sweden’s electricity supply already in the year 2040. But the road is long and fraught with snipigt community legalism.
For sure, has solar energy been more approachable lately, the state has kindly seen to. It is required, for example, no longer permits to install the solar panels on the villataket. In addition, you can still get the refund, even if it is from Wednesday have been reduced.
None of this, however, fulfil any role as long as stadsbyggnadskontoren believe that solar panels are so anskrämliga that they can hardly fit in ordinary residential areas.
but the bitter is what I get when I think about it contradictory that Sweden is a country where the idea of modern architecture, year after year, remains brutalfula betongklumpar that looks to be constructed of Le Corbusier’s depressed brother, and where no one will ever worry about whether these husmonster really harmonize with the existing surroundings or not.
If someone however, to adventure to for example, put up solar cells on the roof at home? Yes, when local authorities suddenly very sensitive to what fits.
It’s all about breaking a bad habit at, and dislike for, the new. Despite the fact that this new – unlike modernist architecture – is actually to the benefit.
in a series of articles now in the spring: how people are denied solar cells with imaginative justifications about these ”distorts the character of the place”, and that passers-by might mistake the black panels for the holes, and so on.
It is about breaking a bad habit at, and dislike for, the new. Despite the fact that this new – unlike modernist architecture – is actually to the benefit.
Sometimes it is suggested in the refusal to choose panels in the same colour as the roof – just that it then becomes an expensive gadget and it reduces the panels ‘ efficiency. To select a different color would all cost at least three times as much as black panels, and therefore made the project unrealistic for many individuals.
sell solar cells, which is a great initiative. But at a fantastic initiative, it will stop, if people don’t also actually must set up their panels.
