Party leader Jonas Gahr Støre is sharply provoked after an interview Erna Solberg did with the NTB.
Erna Solberg defends budsjettgrep
I think this is a nadir from Erna Solberg. What she says is that those who are critical of her proposal will leave 22. July-the terrorist win. And those who disagree with her to go right in its oil wealth to bring money, will leave the damaged government district lie as a monument to the acts of terrorism, ” says Støre to the Newspaper.
– Can say Breivik used
There is the following quote from Erna Solberg has attracted reactions in the course of the day:
– We can let be to build new regjeringskvartal and say that Anders Behring Breivik won – the four buildings he took out, standing like that, as a dead landscape and a monument to the acts of terrorism.
Solberg gave the interview to NTB about the State’s role shall be self-insured, highlighted by the fact that the government has opened for to take the money directly from its oil wealth to finance a new regjeringskvartal and a new frigate for the Norwegian Armed forces.
Erna Solberg answer the following, via his secretary of state, Rune Alstadsæter:
– Jonas Gahr Støre ascribe to me views I do not have. We need to be aware that we the next few years to spend billions of dollars on to build up the government headquarters in Oslo, despite the fact that we now have scaled down the project and added to build it up in different steps. I think it is important that we build up again the government district. It should not was left as an open wound in the middle of the capital, says Solberg to the Newspaper.
Solberg believes, moreover, that the discussion is important to take.
– This is a real priority that all parties must consider in the course of the next year. In my opinion, does not take shall be self-insured-principle from the 1950’s up in the type of terrorism we saw in 2011. Therefore, we must consider how the principle should work in the future. the
– It is an unpleasant matter that concerns the results of the 22. July, but we need to discuss it. We can either look at alternative ways to handle the financing on, as we do in the platform, or let the development go at the expense of other measures that are high priority around the country, ” says Solberg. the
– Fy-fy –
A number of economists and media have been critical of the way the government is considering to post the money, where the billion needed for a new regjeringskvartal and frigate does not go over the current budgets.
the newspaper Dagbladet wrote the following about the practice already last Monday:
“The last stanza on the visa is that the government will now submit to take even more of the state’s milliardutgifter “below the line.” That means that it can use oljepenger outside the fiscal rule. Two aforementioned examples is to replace the billion that sank with the KNM Helge Ingstad, as well as finance the construction of the new government headquarters. Investments of 20 billion, used outside the fiscal rule.
Until now, there has been fy-fy for any government. And with good reason.”
Støre: – the First time
the Prime minister must be happy to travel a discussion about the State’s role shall be self-insured. But to be told that if we disagree with her, we let Anders Behring Breivik win, she should pull back, ” says Støre.
– It is the first time I’ve seen one like that reference to a budget. This comes up in an almost academic discussion.
– do you Fear a relativisering of 22. July-attacked with such references?
I choose to not fear it. Precisely why I wish that the prime minister apologize ordbruken, ” says Jonas Gahr Støre.
This is far over the line, Solberg Leads
