today keeps lagdommer Kristel is New its rettsbelæring for the jury in the Borgarting court of appeal in the trial of Eirik Jensen.
Where should the twelve jurors who until now has followed the case over 76 rettsdager be guided about jussen in the case, and what proof fagdommerne believe are most central.
But there are only ten of the twelve who get to be back in enerommet where Eirik Jensen’s fate is decided.
Follow rettsbelæringen through the day at Dagbladet TV! We have live broadcast from 08.40.
Loddurne
It happens by means of drawing lots, where two of the jurors who have put their lives on hold, page 28. august last year, pulled out, and thus not get to be in a yes or no answer on the issue of guilt. Only the mayor is protected before the draw, and should be on the rådslagningen after rettsbelæringen.
NOT EASILY: Eirik Jensen met with the press just after his appeal to the jury. Here reveals his helgeplaner, and what he thinks about the procedures. Video: Per Ervland Show more
Before the draw, each member a number from 1 to 11. At the same time there will be eleven numbered pieces of wood in a ballot box, which lagdommeren draws from.
– If there are a man first, then the next being a woman. Kjønnsbalansen should be equal, ” says Rune Bård Hansen, lagdommer in the Agder court of appeals and a member of the judges mediegruppe.
– It could certainly have been drawn digitally, but it’s a bit of a solemn ritual, adapted to the seriousness of the cases being processed by the jury, ” says Hansen.
the Parties has no possibility to influence the draw.
– How do you think it is to not get to vote in a case, one has followed in weeks?
Jensen delivers his defence to the jury:- I being mildest spoken cursed
– It can feel both like a relief and an annoyance, so are we humans different.
Half should be men, and half women. It means that one man and one woman in the morning disappears out of the jury.
Seven of these ten must answer “yes” to the questions from the referee’s spørsmålsskrift that Jensen should be found guilty.
Crucial votes
Thus, the two voices that bust out from the jury in the morning will be very crucial in what the jury comes forward to. It needed four jurors to answer “no” to pan and Jensen on every single question, and the two voices that are disappearing could either have gone in favor or disfavor of the korrupsjons and narkotiltalte ex-policeman.
Before the court was set 28. august of last year, met a total of 15 people, clear for the case of jury service. When was a retired financial consultant of 60 years and a pilot for 31 years shot out of Eric Jensen’s defenders. Spesialenheten shot out a 62 year old man who previously went on the capabilities that are used with the Jensen.
MORRISON: the Procedures in the trial of Eirik Jensen still has today. Video: Nicolai Delebekk / Dagbladet / Pool Show more
Thus, the twelve remaining members are now sitting in the 76 rettsdager which is the second last jury. During these nearly five months, they have not been discuss the matter with family, friends or others. They have also been encouraged to keep away from the media, and can not comment about the case on social media.
it May take several days,
When they now retreating alone, continue this concealment. The jury will be placed on the a alone without any of fagdommerne get involved in the discussions. The jury can, however, ask elementary school teacher about spørsmålsskriftet.
It is completely unclear how long the jury will use to get to an answer on the four questions in this matter.
In the Orderud case used jury 29 and a half hours to discuss the in all 25 questions before they voted. In the Nokas case used jury two days of discussions.
basically, can the jury be seated to far into the night every day, and know that they have come to a decision will come about an hour before the reading.
with evidence
in the back room getting the jury with spørsmålsskriftet from the judge. In addition, they may bring pictures, drawings, maps and other artefacts that are presented during the main hearing.
In this case are, however, the jury also take with itself the much talked about the timelines, that has been perhaps the biggest stridstemaet in bevisføringen.
So determined Jensens fate the Newspaper Plus
The over a thousand pages in Spesialenhetens timeline includes everything from telecommunications, bompasseringer, the use of credit cards, cash deposits, travel, meetings, and cappelen in his other contact with hasjligaen between 2009 and 2014.
They have been a very important document both in the district court and the court of appeal. Spesialenheten may, however, edit their timelines after protests from Jensen’s defenders, at the same time as ex-politimannens team had put forward a separate document with appropriate politiaksjoner and other things that happened in the periods in which Cappelen argues Jensen contributed to hasjsmuglingen.
Before the jury draws back thus lagdommer Heyerdahl hold a lecture, where she states the understanding of the law and the law the jury must apply as a basis.
She must ensure that the jury does not misunderstand jussen in the case, something the jury is obliged to stick to. But she will also go through what she and the other two fagdommerne believe are the most important evidence in the case, and what weight the various the evidence should get. The statements about the evidence is only indicative for the jury.
How can Jensen be saved Comment
