All right, everything is important – but is not everything is already known. On their retreat, the SPD called for an end to the Bundestag investment in infrastructure and jobs and research, and a fairer taxation for Internet companies and the strengthening of workers ‘ rights. The inclined Public has in the memory, and the other that wants to make the SPD inclined, it will not convince. After all, the party is in government now (with), and the first question is: Why didn’t you implemented this?
The argument that, anyone who spends a good 20 percent in the result of the election, just 20 percent as a result of the coalition can no longer create, just convinced a long time ago. Because the social-Democrats keep the benefit, far beyond to be the driver of this government Alliance. So, how you communicate things, not with shares the as a success. Which shows that the SPD has not learned to this day from their electoral defeat: Why should you give anyone a voice, if you complained always the loudest, what is all has not been achieved.
Andrea Nahles, who is now party leader, could know: be on time conveyor Oskar Lafontaine was back in 1998, even SPD Chairman, after he had called for a “draft Policy, for we can delight”, but submitted. Nahles has this opportunity. But time is of the essence, the elections in the middle with Power, in Europe, in Bremen and in three Eastern German States. 14 percent in the Federal government and part to single digits in the States, that is, according to Willy Brandt, not a good result. On the contrary, it can mean the slow death of the one and a half century old SPD.
More about
Bavarian social Democrats in Berlin, the Bavaria election Required to bring the SPD into a sweat
Paul Starzmann
according to a “new social Pact” as a reaction to the consequences of globalisation and digitisation. In short: good day care, good education, a good job (and good money). Also this is rather late in the day, weidlich known, but now needs to be spelled out quickly; and, although understandable, is not in the English of a decision at the party Congress. This is because politics, like in a bubble leads not to the voters, but back to their own people. Just to be less each Time.
