the offender and the victim meet again When in court, they often took several agreed with the police and the Prosecutor’s office. Therefore, surveys will begin in front of the court with the question: “you Have said so far, the truth?”
In this case, both the 57-year-old passenger, as well as the 44-year-old SBB travel companion have answered the question before the district court of Zurich with Yes. Bloss: What the party told the court, was the pure opposite of the narrative of the counter-party. Are accused of both: one because of abuse as well as violence and threats against officials. The other due to abuse and multiple assaults.
bill instead of a ticket
carry the Whole thing on Christmas day three years ago in a train from Zurich in the direction of Central Switzerland. At the time of ticket inspection, the woman asked the man the Ticket. In front of him on the shelf of the open wallet, in the window of the Swiss Pass, lag. The man gave her neither the purse nor the passport, the woman took neither the purse nor the Pass.
Finally, he submitted to the SBB employee, a copy of an invoice, which should show that he had a valid General plan. The woman took the paper, turned to the other compartment, and wanted to do with the mobile phone of the account of a photo.
About as far as the statements of the parties Involved, roughly speaking, coincide.
evidence
the woman said The man got up, put them on the shoulder and the paper snatched. At the same time he had called you a “silly cow” and a minimum of eight times with the foot against the left Shin kicked. What the man is saying, not voice.
The man said he had taken the piece of paper, on which the woman have beaten twenty times with both fists against his upper arms. At the same time, you’ve kicked at least ten times against his left Shin, and him as “linggi Pig” insults. What to say to the woman, not the voice.
“It is difficult to understand what really happened,” ruled the judge. Statement against statement, no useful witnesses and a roughly similar credibility. As the judge left, the two award in accordance with the principle “when In doubt, for the accused”. The costs go to the court in cash, i.e. the taxpayer.
Created: 14.12.2018, 09:44 PM
