political the landscape changing all the time. Some changes are visible to all. The transition from Gerhardsen Borten. From old-Labour to Margaret Thatcher. From Bush to Clinton and back again. Other shifts happening in the scenes, such as when Jeppe-club to Kristin Clemet in 2005 laid the foundation for the bourgeois majority rule fourteen years later.
Columnist Tuftebarten .
Anonymous twitter phenomenon, frolicking in langtekst in the Newspaper. Among other things, predicted that Rosenborg are relegated in Adecco league, and that Donald Trump gets the Nobel peace Prize in 2017.
But some change is happening so far below the surface that they are impossible to spot. One of them takes place at this time: Those who hate the Sting is about to take over the power in this country.
Musician Gordon Sumner went from self-proclaimed punker to put the world under their feet. An indisputable musical talent with a meloditeft get bestowed with, yes. But even after having given us gems like “Roxanne”, “Message in a bottle” and “Fields of Gold” was utakk the world’s salary for Newcastles great son.
Let me explain. Since the early 1990s, it has to hate Sting functioned as social capital for all who will up and up in our community. In a job interview or during minglingen before a dinner in the ministry is so social capital is the alpha and omega. In the search for a common denominator, it is wise to not risk too much. The majority of norwegians cheering on Liverpool, but if you were to be so unfortunate that your boss is a Tottenham fan, you should stay away from fotballpraten.
why is there to hate Sting so safely. Everyone hates the Sting. It is a risk-free icebreaker. Together you and Spurs-supporteren that holds the key to your raise baske you in how hopeless Stitch is. How polished the music to his songs. How stupid it is to have tantric sex for 12 hours. How hypocritical it is to pretend to save the rainforest when you fly the helicopter to the lydsjekken. No, when are the Pixies more real. Scruffy and imprecise, but full of soul and nerve.
Tuftebartens guide to this year’s christmas concerts Columnist
as ministries, think tanks, partikontorer and cultural institutions filled up by people who hate Sting, is it actually time to ask us what consequences will this have for Norway? When those sitting in power have come there in the capacity of school to those who succeed, the heaven with the eyes of the people who are involved and dislike good musical craftsmanship, there is every reason to believe that they will continue with this in their new positions.
Let me take one example. The ministry of finance has just received the Norwegian public exposition 2018:17 about the climate risks in the Norwegian economy. Those who now insert themselves in this important kunnskapsdokumentet have only one thing in common: they hate Sting.
the Probability is therefore very high that it will get objections from bureaucrats and political leaders who believe the report is good. That there are too few typographical errors. That conclusion lacks the nerve. Selection as in over a year, have worked hard to produce a solid report, have worked in vain. The effort works against its purpose. Sting-haterne would rather have had a Pixies-report, scruffy and full of charming mistakes.
Will we really have a society where it is not allowed to be clever? We will hand over control to the Stitch-haterne?
– Jonas, I’ve got me more than a Columnist
