Legislative we have done, as we must, but sagsbehandlingsmæssigt we can perhaps be a little sharper.
How does it sound now from Henrik Vendelbo, center director for municipal Services and Digitisation in Fredensborg Municipality to the politiken.dk, who earlier in the day, you could tell that a single mother on kontathjælp had been called up by the municipality and presented a claim for set-off of social assistance because she had received julehjælp.
the Municipality of dropper according to Politiken is now the case – which arose because the julehjælperne had reported julehjælpen as income – and the decision is completely in line with the vast majority of the more than 6000 readers who have taken part in the debate here on the nation!
I Wonder how much Tax has come to find the that up to 80 billion that will soon be thrown out with the bathwater – instead of navlepille here, writes the nation! YouSaidItMan so in a comment and jan’s continues:
– It is in order that the Loop gets kvotekongens cottage made available in the Jutland UB.
– But get a poor ordinary citizen julehjælp, then drops the hammer !!!
– It is the reverse Robin Hood here.Long live capitalism…Lorteland now, writes jan, and of the pt 6623 readers who have participated in the vote below, then more than 90 percent agree that julehjælp should not be set off in f.ex. the cash benefit.