Mr Rösti, is the modern SVP in its biggest crisis?
We have lost the elections in the Canton of Zurich. Since there is nothing to whitewash. At the same time, we have succeeded in a difficult environment, to defend our government seats. And all the other bourgeois parties have lost voters interests. To talk of the biggest crisis would be an exaggeration.

you trivialize.
If the you grow to be as strong as the SVP, there may be a correction.

The SVP loses for the past two years, all cantonal elections.
We have analysed carefully. Since 2015, our vote share has declined to around 1.7 percent. This is not good. But you also do not overdo it. In Zurich, we expected a Minus. It is now bigger, very disappointed.

What do you think?
Three points. Firstly, the debate on climate change. Secondly, the people it is not currently relatively good, therefore, low taxes and bureaucracy are removal so important. Thirdly, many voters due to the non-implementation of the mass immigration initiative frustrated. It is not able to bring them to the ballot box. And since I need to practice massive criticism!

To whom?
Yes It’s nice that many high school students engage in now politically. But, our state television has made the climate to strike an unprecedented propaganda battle.

Yes?
The last two weeks there were almost daily shipments. It seems that there is a need for now Initiative to halve the licence fees, the SRG back to the bottom of the facts. We could relieve the burden on the middle class.

Want to launch the SVP this Initiative?
I would support such a project. This is totally inappropriate and disproportionate air campaign has us and the other middle-class harmed.

to blame for the SVP-a mere is, therefore, the Swiss television?
This is only a factor. But I find it dramatic if the green liberal Tiana is interviewed Moser three days before the elections by the SRF 40 minutes long-with a critical eye to your subject.

After the defeat in Bern in 2018, you have regulates the SVP Basis according to, and more commitment required. Were you ignored?
not at all. I can make the party this time, no charge. The Zurich candidates day and night, even in the cold and wet, with a full commitment to on-the-go. But I have to ask myself: How do we bring it communicative, is that the voters will recognize that only the SVP occurs consistently for independence and security?

The main problem is that the SVP-are topics out. The framework agreement is virtually dead.
Because I need to talk to solid. I’ll bet that the contract is in the next legislature suddenly slim through Parliament.

what votes?
The FDP and the GLP are. The BDP also, but that falls into the weight. The SP, which has the accession to the EU in the party program, will solve the Problem with the unions, and then also say Yes. Also, the CVP will fold. We are the only party that will be after the elections, against this framework agreement, because we are the only, the takeover of the automatic Rights and the position under the European court of justice to reject. But, we managed to a little. I have to admit! Because we all need to be better.

the SVP is not only a communication problem was also evident during the spring session. First, they were franchises for an increase in the Minimum, at the end you are tilted.
Yes, we might have had to talk earlier with our politicians in the Commission. The decision was right, he corresponds to our fight against additional burdens on the middle class. In addition, we are at our most important topics are also victims of our own success.

to what Extent?
It is not our merit, that Switzerland is in the EU. That we have no framework contract. That we have in the area of Migration less of a problem than a few years ago. But the Situation is still not solved. We have 123’000 persons in the field of asylum.

are numbers of The Application on a low.
But those that are here, we will cause enormous costs. This is a time bomb. It’s about to explode.

The Zurich-based SVP-President of the Konrad lang HART said on Sunday, probably need to take the climate concerns of the citizens serious …
… I’ve read.

And?
It would be politically completely wrong, if we would now jump up to seven months before the Federal elections, on the Klimazug, and we felt we were credible.

repositioning can be worthwhile in the long term.
The Concerns of the citizens must always take seriously, as Konrad lang has been hard, but the Greens promoted the measures are wrong. It is important to invest in climate protection in the research. The help in the world and is better than the middle class with non-target leading climate levies ‘ em.

The SVP is the environmental issue extremely wide: From climate-sensitive farmers to the climate-sceptical neo-liberal. How do you create this balance?
That’s not true. We have climate change a clear Position.

The SVP is not green?
Instead of the climate we focus on topics of concern to the population in the long term, a lot more. So, asylum, immigration, the EU, and lower fees and taxes for the middle class. We are also working on a people’s initiative, to transfer approximately 1 billion Swiss francs of development aid in the AHV.

The SVP is a mobilization problem. How do you solve it?
We currently have a message concept.

What is it?
In each section there will be a Ambassador. The Ambassador must be SVPler, perhaps Retired, have the time and the people in the village know. You need to know to which door-to-door on election day must ring the bell to reach people who would otherwise stay home. We believe that every Ambassador is convinced 50 people to our party. At 1000 sections were then 50’000 additional voters.

your most important Ambassador is still Christoph Blocher. He is missing?
He can not be easily replaced. But Christoph Blocher is taking from outside of the party line of influence if it needs it.

he Will have to in the autumn in the pants?
He supported the party wherever possible. However, it is equally important that he focuses on the EU question and the fight against the framework agreement.

Customize the SVP-choice destination for the October 2019?
of Course not. The choice of destination. 29.4 percent. In the awareness that this is a huge Challenge.

Are you still the Right one?
I was a 2015 election campaign Manager, as we grew by 2.5 percent. The current loss hurts. But I am only right with all his strength.

you Are too fond of?
This is a strength. So I convince a lot of voters.

(editing Tamedia)

Created: 25.03.2019, 21:43 PM