A huge corona wave is rushing through China. In Germany and Europe, there is more confusion than clarity about how to deal with this. Some are calling for mandatory tests for travelers from China, others consider this to be excessive. There is also the question of whether China could become a breeding ground for more dangerous virus variants. The EU states wanted to discuss a uniform reaction on Wednesday afternoon. Important aspects of the current situation:
In the massive wave of infections after the abrupt end of the strict zero-Covid policy almost a month ago, several hundred million Chinese have already been infected. There is no accurate picture of the situation in the most populous country on earth because the authorities no longer publish figures. The hospitals are overcrowded, fever and explanatory drugs are often sold out.
After almost three years of complete isolation, the country is opening up again to foreign countries, and air traffic, which has been radically reduced for a long time, is likely to be increasingly resumed. According to experts, there were around 2,500 to 3,000 international flights a day before the pandemic, but the number had fallen to 100 to 150 at times.
The EU health authority ECDC does not currently expect that the increase in the number of cases in China will affect the epidemiological situation in the EU. The variants circulating in China also exist here, so they do not pose any particular challenge to the immune system of the citizens. In addition, EU citizens have comparatively good immunity from infections and vaccinations on average. The Bremen epidemiologist Hajo Zeeb assesses the situation similarly.
The EU countries are striving for a unified response to the massive corona wave in China. According to the EU Commission, the vast majority of EU countries support corona tests before leaving China for the EU. EU Health Commissioner Stella Kyriakides wrote on Twitter on Tuesday that measures such as pre-departure tests and increased monitoring of waste water had come closer. Several EU countries had already pushed ahead with rules for travelers from China.
no The epidemiologist Gérard Krause from the Helmholtz Center for Infection Research (HZI) in Braunschweig is against entry controls. Such containment measures make sense “for a short initial phase of an epidemic or pandemic, but not now”. He hopes that “authorities and governments will not allow themselves to be drawn into a competition for measures”. Hajo Zeeb assumes that testing travelers would have little impact on the spread of the virus. The epidemiologist Klaus Stöhr sees it similarly. The Federal Association of Physicians in the Public Health Service and the Chairman of the Board of the World Medical Association, Frank Ulrich Montgomery, are in favor of compulsory testing across Europe. There are different opinions as to whether it should be a direct PCR test or whether rapid tests should suffice.
Rapid tests detect proteins of the coronavirus. They only work when there is a relatively high viral load – in contrast to PCR. The sensitivity of the tests on the market also varies greatly. A study by the Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich showed in early 2022 that the hit rate of some common rapid tests for the omicron variant with a very high viral load was between 31 and 78 percent. The national chairman of the Virchowbund, Dirk Heinrich, sees a problem with the quality of the swab in addition to the different sensitivity of the tests: “It depends very much on how well it was done – whether you were mean enough, so to speak. A little stroking of the nose is not enough.”
In France, PCR tests will be mandatory after arrival from China. Italy requires a rapid test both before departure and after arrival. If the result is positive, a PCR test is mandatory, and positive samples should also be sequenced in order to be able to identify new variants. So far, Germany has not required a negative test from travelers from China. On Wednesday, Austria wanted to start analyzing the waste water from the aircraft toilets of machines from China. If variants are found during the sequencing, these would be reported to the EU and the WHO.
In a recent report on variants, Richard Neher, head of the research group Evolution of Viruses and Bacteria at the Biozentrum of the University of Basel, comes to the conclusion that two variants dominate in China, BF.7 and BA.5.2, which also already occur in Germany. The other variants detected were similar to those circulating in the rest of the world. So far no strongly deviating mutations are known.
The situation in China – many infections in a short time in a population without much contact with Omikron – is “rather unfavorable” for the development of an immune escape variant, explains Neher. No general trend can be identified with regard to the severity of the disease. The virologist Isabella Eckerle also thinks it is not particularly likely that a variant will develop in China that escapes an immune system that has adapted to the virus. “Of course it’s possible that a new, more worrying variant will emerge, but it could also come from another part of the world where we get little sequences.”
For Richard Neher, monitoring aircraft effluent or anonymous samples from travelers can be a building block of a variant monitoring strategy. But he also makes it clear: “Stopping a variant has never worked.” Klaus Stöhr also considers variant monitoring to be “certainly scientifically interesting”. However, if unknown variants appear, it would first have to be examined which changed properties they actually have. Zeeb advocates international pressure for China to provide better information on the variants circulating there.
“Aha! Ten minutes of everyday knowledge” is WELT’s knowledge podcast. Every Tuesday and Thursday we answer everyday questions from the field of science. Subscribe to the podcast on Spotify, Apple Podcasts, Deezer, Amazon Music, among others, or directly via RSS feed.