DF-boss Kristian Thulesen Dahl has served wee pill for Anders Vistisen, but still have the sprinkled sugar on.
Anders Vistisen was yesterday demoted from the party’s number one to second place, where for the may elections to the European Parliament.
But to get the harsh decision to slide easier down, the party decided to change the rules of the DF are to be sent to Brussels.
Technically, going the party from the side-by-side arrangement for so-called party list.
It means that Anders Vistisen can count on to be elected to the seat in the belgian capital, almost regardless of how many votes the other two established DF’s, Peter Kofod and Pia Adelsteen, had to reap.
When the parties present candidates for party list system, allocated listestemmer, when the switch was ‘just’ checked out for the party’s name, even after partiledelsens desire.
On the way, DF-management according to Ekstra information tried to prevent, Anders Vistisen leaving the party and politics as such – something else he has threatened, if he was not the candidate at the head.
group Chairman Peter Skaarup explains, however, that there is also the other big advantage of ændingen of opstillingsmetode that the party leadership has more control over who is selected.
– We fundamentally believe that it must be the vote that determines who will be selected. But we do it specifically for the EP-elections, because we the last two periods have experienced the non-attached members, he says.
– As there have been too many concern, when the voters themselves have been able to determine?
– It is you who says it. But for the sake of the voters, who vote for the Danish people’s Party, we have chosen to do, as when we started the Danish people’s Party to make the party in order to secure ourselves against vagrancy.
– But Anders Vistisen can also leave you?
In principle, yes, but we have more a grip on who we bring in top of the list. And who will be chosen.
– But In the sprinkles at the same time a little sugar out ove a decision, which has disappointed Anders Vistisen?
– It can take on several different ways. However, there is then the positive side effect that Anders Vistisen has a good opportunity to be selected, recognising Peter Skaarup.
the Danish policy – 4. feb. 2019 – at. 15:02 Qvortrup: Brutal Tulle
the Danish policy – 4. feb. 2019 – at. 14:19 DF’s eats its words: Must play second fiddle
the Change of the electoral system means that Anders Vistisen only misses the re-election, if the DF will be reduced from the current four seats to one seat in the european parliament. And it will require an almost historic katastrofevalg.
the Loser of this game can be Pia Adelsteen, which is being set up as the DF’s number three for the may elections.
Her only option to be chosen is that the DF get at least three candidates to the parliament. And it requires almost even a kanonvalg a la 2014, Morten Messerschmidt, got danmarkshistoriske 460.000 votes.
– Peter Skaarup, has a well told Pia Adelsteen, that now she gets the right difficulty to be chosen?
– of course, we have. It has been a whole open dialogue with the Pia Adelsteen on.
– We can not count with enough a fantomvalg. We will be happy and satisfied if we get two seats, says the group chairman.
the Article continues under the picture
Anders Vistisen gives interview about her role in the Messerschmidt case. Photo: Jacob Jørgensen
Worth noting is that DF has previously voiced concerns about the central partistyring of listestemmer by assigning high profile politicians so-called safe circles to the general election.
group Chairman Peter Skaarup has specifically criticised the fact that he can risk to lose the internal struggle of parties on the seats in the Parliament, because some lokalkredse provides so many votes that the other candidates in the storkredsen risk to lose, even if the whole storkredsen have scored more votes than the candidate, who have gained big in its lokalkreds
– When you have decided on side-by-side arrangement, it should be the pure personal votes, which determines it, for a voice in one circuit is just as good as a vote in another. I see a democratic problem in it, said Peter Skaarup to London in 2014.
Unity is the party that is most known for to use the party-establishment. It is the party’s annual meeting, which up to the general election determines opstillingsrækkefølgen of the candidates and thus, to a significant degree, who should be elected to the Danish Parliament.
