Recently, we received news: the little brother may not go to the same school as his two years older sibling. The same information, many other parents in Nacka scored. The reason is said to be that the municipality has amended its selection criteria.
the Municipality refers to a judgment in the court of Appeal that they have been forced to make changes to the sibling priority as previously applied. To changes in society is nothing new, but to call skolvalet for free is at least an exaggeration, when even the children are placed in different schools and did not get any of their three choices of shipowners.
We took the opportunity to take advantage of our three options to avoid a school that had major problems in the 15 years of time, but when the news came, we got none of the three options we provided.
instead, going on the principle of subsidiarity and placed our youngest son in the school that we want to avoid.
When I finally get a hold of someone responsible refers to our three requests, and that it only differs 220 metres from our door, between the different schools. But it is like talking on deaf ears.
the Same day we got the news promised the minister of education, Anna Ekström (S) in an interview with TT that ”no parent should worry that siblings will be forced to go to different schools”. What is it that does not work?
the sides of the matter. Most importantly, children are safe to go to the same school as their older siblings. But it is also about parents who have problems to get together their vardagspussel, to avoid having to take on two, three or four kindergartens/schools. And at the same time, the film work in between.
not to mention the who are single and trying to get it together the puzzle.
There is also an environmental aspect in it all. Which parent can get together all of the above, but to put them in the car and rush around in the morning rush hour around our schools instead of walking their children to one place and then jump on the bus to his job?