Well, the glasses entrepreneur no longer wanted to be exposed to the increased media interest, which had ruled in may 2017 before the district court of Horgen. Even back then, Nicole had been Diem due to mismanagement, lack of accounting, to the prejudice of Creditors, through asset reduction, as well as due to intentional gross traffic rule violation to the unconditional freedom and fined.
you don’t moved the verdict to the upper court, because they wanted to jail and a reduced fine. As usual in such cases, the Supreme court a public hearing of the appeal. But a few days before the hearing, it came to the surprising turn of. Now accepted Diem suddenly, the unconditional prison sentence, and requested only a reduction of the fine of 120 day-fine of 200 Swiss francs to 90 daily rates of 200 Swiss francs.
No public process
but Above all, they demanded that no public process is taking place, but that the case is done in a written procedure. Only problem is that When it comes to the amount of a penalty, among other things, so also the subjective Seriousness of the offence, the code of criminal procedure (StPO) no written procedure.
The Supreme court accepted the Request. It seems to be based on the view that “the presence of the accused is required”, as it says in the code of criminal procedure. With other words: For the determination of the penalty, it did not seem necessary to give the accused Person a personal impression.
in addition to the additional court and lawyer costs, the businesswoman reached but nothing. The Supreme court confirmed the judgment of the district court of Horgen in full. This was also possible because the public Prosecutor’s office amended its original cross-appeal, which called for an unsuspended custodial sentence of eleven months, and with the confirmation of the Horgen judgment zufriedengab.
bankruptcy deported
The former flagship entrepreneur, received in 2006, the Swiss prize for innovation at a time when she was sentenced, among other things, for tax fraud, and your company had a debt of one Million Swiss francs, had disputed before the district court of all the allegations and put the blame on your Advisor to be deported.
Before the high court, they had to accept their new defender, that they delayed the bankruptcy of their company, with accounting tricks, the Situation of their company, disguised, and for many years no audit reports were produced. Also that she founded after the bankruptcy of a collecting society, the values in the amount of almost 2 million Swiss francs for CHF 60’000 acquired. What led to the prejudice of Creditors. (Tages-Anzeiger)
Created: 08.04.2019, 09:00 PM