Since the 24. In March, the main conclusions of the Russia-special investigator Robert Mueller is known. The last word is not yet spoken for a long time, if Donald Trump and his followers to turn diligently to round up their Victory.
On Wednesday evening, both the “New York Times, reported” the Washington Post, some employees of the special investigator with the presentation of the test result is not satisfied. Minister of justice, William Barr, had drawn in his four-page letter to Congress, a far too positive picture. The 400-page Report contains a lot of Unpleasant for the President.
When these sources blame Barr, to have hasty a judgment about trump’s possible obstruction of Justice like that, do you to the Minister of justice, however, is wrong: Because Mueller had from yet unknown reasons, open the question of whether Trump operation, for example through the dismissal of FBI Director James Comey in may of 2017, obstruction of Justice, was able to give Barr the President an acquittal. Because of the special investigator guidelines of the Ministry of justice, clearly indicate that the Minister of justice has the last word, if the special investigator rejects the assessment of the facts of the case.
Neither Mueller wanted to impeach the President for obstruction of Justice, he still wanted to relieve him, although the evidence was according to an anonymous source, the “Washington Post” by far “better” than the Barr presented. In addition, there appears to be “more previously unknown information” as the TV channel NBC News on Thursday reported, citing insiders. The President and his defenders, these media may not like it reports. You want evaporation Mueller’s Report on two statements:
It had been in 2016, not a conspiracy between the Trumps of the election campaign staff and Moscow. And the obstruction of Justice was not demonstrated.
The First is true, not open but other interpretations, the Second is not true.
On Thursday, Trump and his friends caution went half on the Offensive: The “New York Times” have “no legitimate sources,” the report of the newspaper was a “Fake News,” tweeted the President.
trump’s lawyer Rudy Giuliani went a step further and called Mueller’s Team as a “rabid Democrats” and “gang of devious and unethical whistle-blowers”.
The New York Times had no legitimate sources, which would be totally illegal, concerning the Mueller Report. In fact, they probably had no sources at all! They are a Fake News paper who have already been forced to apologize for their incorrect and very bad reporting on me!
— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) 4. April 2019
the President and all Republican members of the house of representatives Supported a few days ago a release and publication of the final report, so they are now not so sure.
In an Interview with Fox News, described the Republican representative Devin Nunes – a loyal follower of Trumps – the Report on Wednesday, even as a “Mueller-Dossier”, in order to bring him in the vicinity of the controversial “Steele dossier,” the British Ex-spy Christopher Steele.
in fact, when all the joy of Mueller’s Absolution of the President studiously, that the special investigator thinks the Russian interference in the presidential election campaign in 2016, in favour of Donald trump’s to be proven.
Why are the Russians with Amateurs?
in Addition, NBC News reported, citing an Insider, Mueller’s Report contained a “detailed representation of the contacts between Donald trump’s campaign staff and Russia”. Further, the station reported: “While Mueller was no coordination or conspiracy, some members of his team, this Insider, according to the image of a choice of fighting force, which has been manipulated by an elaborate Russian intelligence operation.”
That Trump and his helpers 2016 willingly were part of a clandestine Operation in Moscow, has never sounded so plausible: Who in the Russian intelligence services had been entrusted to a round of Amateurs, and their reliability was questionable, and whose erratic behavior posed immense risks?
for weeks, or even months will pass, until the Report of the special investigator of some of the masses can be read in its entirety. Only then, a final image will be possible. Maybe it will be a far less rosy for the President, as so far it was said of him. (Editorial Tamedia)
Created: 05.04.2019, 10:37 PM
