“the future of mobility: opportunities of a new transport policy for Berlin” – sounds like a Revolution? With your claim, the people may abolish their cars, the Berlin transport Senator Regine Günther (independent, to provide for Green), their 15-minute presentation time. At the invitation of the company and the Central Association of the CDU stand you had spoken to your topic. Your message is ensured even in their own house for attention, and the question: “Did she really say that?” She has.
What will the transport Senator?
Because the old concept of mobility, the car pushes just the city to his borders, not more help, re-adjustments, said Günther. The Public passenger transport (public TRANSPORT), Bicycle infrastructure, structure and Sharing services need to be expanded so that the individual transport without own Car: “We want the people to abolish their car,” said the transport Senator.
What is the goal of the Senator for the city?
First of all, a big business for car-sharing providers (see Text). Regine Günther does not want to break the Berliners driving the car entirely, but you to waiver on your own car motivate. This is statistically about 23 hours of the day, blocks approximately ten square meters, the bottom of which has the value doubled, depending on the location in the past ten years at least. Sharing vehicles are clearly moving more frequently. However, shared cars like alleviate Parking problems, but not the Problem of the especially in commuter traffic increasingly congested roads.
The number of in Berlin approved cars both in absolute terms (just over 1.2 million passenger Cars) as well as relative (to 342 cars per 1000 inhabitants) increased. Green waves are in the irregularly structured city have been very limited, and the place is already so unfair to the environment to the detriment of distributed friendly means of transportation that motorists can hope for no further concessions. Only occasionally costly compromises are possible, such as the Canopy of the urban motorway, which destroyed in some Places, entire neighborhoods – and where it runs underground, as in the Britzer Tunnel, people can place to live and to Relax. But, on the whole, the following applies: If the growing Berlin does not want to are literally suffocating under the avalanche, you need to go more people to walk, bike, or Bus and train use.
daily mirror people
for Free
What are the pre-order advantages and disadvantages would result for the Berlin?
The car traffic would be two types of stem: By “harassment”, i.e., elimination of Parking, increase fees, driving restrictions, one-way streets, dead-ends. The would be to the detriment of motorists, but with more congestion and Parking finder – also, for those uncomfortable are intended to benefit from them. Reasonably, the policy needs to improve, therefore, prefer the Alternative. Thus, from studies is known that there is a huge group of potential cyclists, but given today’s conditions rather. Pedestrian feel of cars and cyclists are harassed, if their sidewalks are not consistently protected. The policy would have to deal with so much more consistent than in the past to these groups and in parallel with the public transport more attractive.
A thanks to of better Alternatives, significantly reduced car traffic would be a gigantic win for the metropolis: Better air with less particulate matter and nitrogen oxide. A lot less than the previous level of around 18 000 people per year were killed in accidents in city traffic. Children could move on to quieter and more littered with parked cars back to the self-employed, in low traffic areas of the play. The people would be, thanks to more movement and less noise overall healthier and would have cost thanks to saved car more money. On the streets, passers-by will no longer have to be on the narrow Paths between pub tables and incorrectly parkerizing by crowding; buses and all those who are really dependent on the car, would be less in a traffic jam.
Can work in a metropolis car?
In Small – and medium-sized towns are car-free centers has long been established and proven; the supply of transport is allowed to the areas – part limited in time – driven. Experience from Europe and America show Where car traffic disappears, blooms the urban life – the Paris Bank of the Seine river and the Willamette River in Portland, Oregon, as well as for Artà on Mallorca. Other cities such as Vitoria, in the Basque country on “Super Blocks” where through-traffic just rolls on higher-level roads, while the residential signposted streets, opposing one-way streets or dead-ends, and, therefore, for motorists to be unattractive.
In Berlin, beyond the chip duration old town with almost no car-free areas. A car-free capital, is for many reasons unrealistic. If eligible for single Kiezzentren or parts of the high-density downtown. The latter is usually defined by the S-Bahn Ring. The surrounds only ten percent of the city area, in which but a quarter of the population lives.
That means in reverse: On the other 90 percent of the Berlin city area, the paths are longer and without a car is often cumbersome. Alone within the district of Treptow-Köpenick, the distance A may be after B is about 20 kilometers. Running any cycle to only a few.
How does the country policy?
After representatives of the Opposition criticized Guenther for their foray sharp and you had referred to so often as “Anti-car-Senator” (CDU) or “Car-hater” (AfD), a representative of the Greens pointedly to her side. “Mrs Günther has said, nothing Revolutionary, the claim is a green policy,” said Antje Kapek, Head of the Green parliamentary group in the house of representatives. Günther have discussed with your statement of a “General green principle,” said Kapek and made it clear: “We are working to create the conditions to ensure that the people can take away your car.” Harald Moritz, traffic policy spokesman of the Green group, added: “to say it clear: We don’t want to take away the car or ban. Our goal is to offer people Alternatives to the car, so that you don’t need a car anymore.“ Instead of the Governing mayor Michael Müller (SPD), said a spokeswoman: “It is not at all unusual, and senators, like all people, make certain you important topics, thoughts, and comments.”
