(Finansavisen.en): Borgarting court of appeal has upheld the decision by Oslo first instance judgment again upheld the decision from the Ministry of finance and the very first in the financial supervisory authority of norway.
Odd Kalsnes shall not be allowed to be responsible and responsible mediator in his meklervirksomhet, but only private mediator.
Even reject him, that the court has considered the evidence legal.
– They know the state will win 80 per cent of the cases. I remember it from the time when I even worked on likningskontoret, says Kalsnes to Mallorca.
Never used the title
I have never used the title “responsible mediator”. Financial supervisory authority of norway has used nearly five years to deprive me of a title I never used. I have always used the title “attorney”, and is going to continue with it, ” says Kalsnes to the newspaper.
the Background is that Kalsnes borrowed 14,75 million to a company owned by Ola Chr. Santa to the purchase of Tidemands gate 21, which was built and sold in 2012 and 2013 of the 44 million. In addition, the transmitted Tim Want 5.5 million for the development of the Kruses gate 6 to an account Kalsnes outlined.
financial supervisory authority of norway believed Kalsnes had an active role in the projects, but Kalsnes has claimed that the loan was to give him an option to buy an apartment for his ekssamboer, Life Anniken Berg, and that he in Kruses gate was a counselor.
financial supervisory authority of norway accuses also Kalsnes to have purchased an apartment in full as street, after a short time that his own business had the mission to sell the apartment. Here are he also to have used a proformaarrangement to avoid arrest from the ekssamboeren, writes Finansavisen.
– They will make an example. I am both a mediator and a lawyer – that is the worst thing you can be, ” he says.
– Can not disprove the
– This is pure copy of tingrettsdommen. The appellate court has not made any legal assessment. On behalf of the entire industry must the judgment be appealed to the Supreme court, ” he says to the newspaper.
– the Supreme court has never before tried a case on proprietary trading. It must strekes up guidelines. Other actors to practice proprietary trading four months after the termination mission. For my part, it was been more than six months.
He characterizes the judgment as without tangible proof, where all the decisions have been in his disfavor.
Kalsnes imposed costs on the additional 97.200 million from this round on behalf of the state in addition to their own.
Other financial news:
Promises to work after 12 weeks of education
Shell with milliardhopp – delivers knalltall
