– That’s why the judges have set the ruling aside, that lagretten could find him guilty of corruption, but not the importation. What should he have gotten the money for then? says the scientist who for many years has fought for an abolition of the juryordningen.
Lars-Jonas Nygard says it is enough that one or two pieces in the jury have arrived at this conclusion.
– How is jurysystemet. When one then adds that there is no justification, so you can see how complicated this really is, ” says the former lagdommeren.
Spesialenheten: – A logical inconsistency Video
at the same time characterize the Nygard tilsidesettelsen as a drama.
– It is not often fagdommerne put a frifinnende order to the page. When are they going to find it unanimously no doubt that the defendant is guilty. One may also imagine fagdommernes dilemma here when looking at the economic side of this.
He outlines that it is far from certain that the bevisførselen are the same in the next rettsrunde.
, the Parties must add up the matter with the aim to convince the two fagdommere and five lekdommere sitting together in court all the time. It is a completely different strategy than reaching out to the ten lekdommere in lagretten.
– It will be interesting to see how the parties put up bevisførselen in the new round. I think they are going to cut down considerably on the material.
(NTB)
midst of the Fire: – Hope someone takes to sense Video