The government is too relaxed

woman Rickli, with which topic you wins in the Canton of Zurich elections?
The one big topic. My campaign is under the title “security”. The safety in the public space, and it also involves threats such as violence against officials, domestic violence or terrorism. Ultimately, the issue of safety touches but all of the directorates. It is also a safe and secure infrastructure, secure energy supply, a reliable health system, legal security and social security.

What about security in a narrow sense, in Zurich, mainly the judiciary and the security Directorate. Both are led by social Democrats, of Jacqueline and Mario Fehr. What would you do differently?
The Canton police is well-placed. I wouldn’t change much. What concerns the domestic violence, I support the violence prevention programs. But I am also of the opinion that the perpetrators must be punished. Today, an offender who beats his wife or his children, better than someone who got an “Unknown” to the violence. In migration policy, there are other grievances: Recently it was announced that alone in Zurich per year, 90 marriages with Minors were legalized. The shocked me. Such marriages may not be recognized in the future.

but can not change the government. Since it goes to the Federal government.
The government can use the Federal for a ban on the recognition. And that’s what he should do.

your party is calling regularly for a stricter immigration policy. They are also available with the Canton of Zurich dissatisfied?
The Canton copes with the challenges of migration policy as a whole quite well. There are, however, potential for optimization, for example in the Integration and in the case of the deportation procedures. In addition, the government is too relaxed about the future. The projected population growth to 325’000 people by 2040. The mass immigration initiative did not come about by chance.

your party wants to terminate by the Initiative of the free movement of persons. They sit on the Committee. This is the way out?
I am in favour of negotiating with the EU, with the objective that Switzerland shall control the immigration of the Autonomous again. The Federal Council has done in the “implementation” of the initiative against Mass immigration is not a good work. I am of the opinion that a better solution can be found, finally, Switzerland has some of the things that can put them in the pan. I am in favour of the bilateral treaties, most of them run well. But we have a Problem with the free movement of persons.

What consequences would it have for the Canton of Zurich, Switzerland would terminate the free movement of persons agreement?
It is terminated at the Moment nothing. The first priority of the Initiative of the negotiations.

But it says in the Initiative that in the case of a Failure of the negotiations, the agreement is terminated should be. And the probability of failure is large. Therefore, we need to talk about the consequences for Zurich.
Zurich would be the master. It is clear that our economy is in need of certain professionals. This will continue to be able to come. Today, it is in the Canton of Zurich, but in a way that only half of the migrants come for employment and many are not in shortage occupations work, but, for example, in the case of the public sector.

During the Zurich government Deal in favour of the tax/AHV, decline it. Why is the Zurich government wrong?
The Zurich-based government is not wrong, but it has a different focus than I do. Zurich needs the tax part of the template, which is why the government accepted the total package. Also, I am in favour of the tax, but as a national councillor, my focus must apply to the Whole. I find the link to the AHV absurd and reject the Deal out of state on political grounds. As the next fighter jet and paternity leave are linked.

As a councillor, you would thus change the focus and Deal support?
Yes, as a member of a collegial authority, I would do that.

they are considered to be loyal SVP politician. In the question of the export of Weapons in civil war countries you care about. Since you have voted as the only SVP representative with the Ratslinken. Why?
Because I find the expansion of exports on civil war countries neutrality to be politically incorrect. And it displeases me, if we supply arms to countries which violate human rights.

councillor candidate Roger Köppel shoots sharply against all the other bourgeois parties. Try, meanwhile, is striking a good agreement in the bourgeois camp . . . This seems to be a bit kakofonisch.
A member of the cantonal government election is something other than a Battle, a Council of States seat logical that since fighting different choice. What is the member of the cantonal government election subject: There we are, five Civil a super team. Of course, we have selectively different views. But we want to work together for the Canton of Zurich. And, in General, a policy may be a bit emotional. The political opponents can fight back, Yes, if he is attacked.

(Tages-Anzeiger)

Created: 27.02.2019, 21:06 PM