very wrong about Extra the Magazine’s coverage of Henrik Sass Larsen and his absence from the meetings with the public accounts committee.

Among other things, that we have stood in front of the restrooms at the Palace, and we run the manhunt.

But there is also in the past week said and written right.

F. eks. hit journalist and folketingskandidat of the Left, Anna Libak spot with this update on Facebook:

’I Think that it is a sin for Henrik Sass Larsen? Yes, it I think. But I think so too, that Poul Madsen should be ashamed? No, I think not. His newspaper, since not know that Sass Larsen has a depression, and of course, it is of interest to the public, the politicians do their work as state auditors, when they are paid with 330.000 revenue per year. I would think that it was a bigger problem, if we didn’t have newspapers as an Extra Magazine to keep up with what the citizens ‘ money goes to.’

It is obviously, I agree.

I’m a little lecture to a bunch of younger people on Ekstra expertise as a watchdog.

I showed them a number of examples of our revelations. Lars Løkke and the GGGI case. The case of Loop clothing, which was paid by the Left, and thus also to the taxpayer. The stories about Morten Messerschmidt and the abuse of EU funds. The revelations of members ‘ money was used for expensive wines by the management in Academic A-box. And, by the revelations of Henrik Sass Larsen’s absence from the high paying job as statsrevisor.

the Examples show that we write about it, even if they do not like to hear it. We cut through the spin and documenting the facts. And we are on target for the stories, when one is trying to discredit us.

I sensed a quite good karma in the room. Most can see the point.

the news chief at Berlingske Simon Andersen, who the other day wrote on Facebook that Poul Madsen does his work, and it should all be grateful for.

Jyllands-Posten, wrote an editorial on the case and beat the following:

’the Extra the Magazine’s journalistic work has been absolutely legitimate, and it is obvious that Henrik Sass Larsen should be obliged to answer relevant questions in this context. And if he did not want it because he had it bad, he should long ago have sick leave. Or should good people around him encouraged him to it. Longer the no. On the Extra Leaf so as to have exceeded the agreed rules of the relationship between the politicians and the press in its attempts to get the Henrik Sass Larsen case, is another matter. That must await the investigation, which is set in motion in the Danish Parliament.’

we now know that the answer to The complaint over the Extra Magazine was that we must comply with the rules, we have continuously complied with.

I Think that it is a sin for Henrik Sass Larsen, that he has had depression? Yes, it I think. Depression is a serious matter. But it does not mean that I stop being a journalist.