The young Greens to make a compliment. You have the niedergeglommenen spatial planning debate of oxygen. Your people’s initiative against the urban sprawl is nothing “untimely”, as the former Minister of the environment Doris Leuthard (CVP) said. The concern speaks to a pressing issue. To be right with him, the political pressure, the advanced Settlement sprawl, and stem maintained. The Initiative deserves to be on 10. February, at least, a success.
And yet: it should be rejected. Because it is and remains only the second-best solution to the sprawl problem. She is in some way a metaphor for the youth of their authors: impatience is characteristic. A Yes to the Initiative, meant for the space planning first, a sharp and rapid cut: the total area of The Swiss building zones would be capped by now.
In contrast, the 2013 adopted spatial planning act, acts more slowly; the reaction is carried out stage by stage. However, the same target is controlled, and this is literally targeted: The building zones are not frozen, just, but, to zurückgezont where large,. The reserves may not exceed a plausible 15-years-of need. Up to in April the last of the cantons to have improved, whether with enthusiasm or with Gemurre their lesson plans accordingly.
well, Now it belongs to the peculiarities of many of the initiatives that its effects can not with certainty predict.
It is unclear whether this process could be led by a ‘ Yes ‘ to the Initiative. The initiators believe, the Federal Council doubted it: return zonungen not mentioned in the initiative’s text. Now it is one of the peculiarities of many of the initiatives that its effects can not with certainty predict. This is not a priori against you. The tragedy of the urban sprawl initiative is that it threatens one of the most intelligent of the law projects of the last decades to inflict damage. The pathetic formula of the “large litter”, the new spatial planning act is appropriate for once. The Initiative would make the building zones regime back to the revision case.
This Chance will try to grab the opponents of a strict spatial planning. From the cynical costed among them is to be heard behind closed doors already, that you agree with the urban sprawl initiative: on that unpopular provisions such as the return zonungen and value-added taxes for landowners from the law will disappear. Gehortetes land should be certainly saved masses before his rescue. It may not be in the sense of the initiator, to cause such a risk.
Sommaruga, it is trust that you will accompany the Dossier with the necessary Rigour.
For risky brute force methods, there is currently no reason. The Department has to monitor the rear zonungen, since the beginning of the year under new management. Environment Minister Simonetta Sommaruga (SP) was sitting once in the Committee of the countryside initiative, which provided for a building moratorium. This should initiators and citizens that want to carry our landscape concern voting, with Confidence meet. Sommaruga, it is trust that you will accompany the Dossier with the necessary Rigour.
And the Green, whether young or old, should not be on the building zones, but the area outside of the same focus. The construction boom that is taking place there at the Moment, is more than questionable, and the proposed Regulatory of the Federal Council are not convincing. For landscape conservationists, there are more than enough to do.
(editing Tamedia)
Created: 25.01.2019, 20:57 PM
