Care for the elderly is an incorrect explanation for the deaths

in Sweden, the strategy was not to stop the spread of infection altogether, but it did allow a certain spread of infection among our young people, for example, by holding the primary, and the restaurants are open. At the same time, protect the elderly, by way of recommendations and for healthcare workers with symptoms to stay at home. The strategy failed and, in Sweden, and not because of the increase in the proportion of elderly people have died, but for the fact that we had a greater spread of infection in the community than in many other countries.

the Covid-19 were difficult to assess. Many are warned, initially, in order to allow the infection to spread in the community. The warning was the right thing. Folkhälsomyndigheten thought the infection was relatively benign, the mortality rate per infected, and the scale of the epidemic, and they were in the wrong. Playing down the risk
Now a great deal of the debate about what went wrong, what we can learn from, and what we can do for you, the next pandemic did not have the same impact as the covid-19. All of that belittled those risks, including the Folkhälsomyndigheten, is now trying to blame the high mortality rate in the failure is specific to the care of the elderly, however, argue that the approach in general was appropriate.

We do not have a greater proportion who have died in the care of the elderly than in other comparable countries

no matter what you think about the strategy, it is important to note that Sweden has a similar proportion of deaths amongst older people as to other comparable countries. If there is anything that stood out about this virus is that it is mainly older people who had died in the covid-19.

for more than 70 years of age, who had died in the covid-19 in some other comparable countries: Finland, 85% in Denmark to 90% in Norway, 87% in Germany to 86% in the Netherlands and 89 per cent. This compares with the 89 per cent. It is, therefore, approximately the same proportion of elderly people who died in the compared countries. Yet the claims of many in this debate, including the government and the Folkhälsomyndigheten, that the approach worked in general, but the fact that we are not able to protect those who had the care of the elderly.
if you are affected care of the elderly
However, if the comparability of the countries had a similar proportion of older people who had died, how odd is it, then, that there are many people that have died had the care of the elderly, really? It is not, then, of course, is that a large number of those who died in Sweden, has been living in a residential care or assisted living?

How could it be otherwise, when they die, the covid-19-the overwhelming majority of the 70’s, and a large proportion of the elderly in Sweden either live in nursing homes or assisted living? It is, of course, is just a correlation, as well as many of the people who died in the covid-19, had a pension, high blood pressure, or other common among the elderly.
the Major risk of death for all ages

the Truth of the matter is that this whole debate is that we have had in the care of the elderly is false. We do not have a greater proportion who have died in the care of the elderly than in other comparable countries, which, among other things, Quarter of the year shown, in comparison to our nordic neighbouring countries. If we are to compare ourselves with the neighbours, you can see that the risk of dying from covid-19 is approximately the same in Sweden for all age groups. The explanation is, of course, is that we had a better spread of infection in the community than in the neighbouring countries. As a result, more people have died in the covid-19 in Sweden, regardless of age, and therefore the greater the relative risk, as compared with the same age range as in the neighbouring countries, regardless of whether the person has had the care of the elderly or not.

it is not possible to protect older people and those in at risk groups? Doubtful, but at the international level has been suggested to protect the elderly, for example, to allow embedded personnel to stay and work with the elderly. No proposal that is similar to what has been around in Sweden.

a Direct consequence of the strategy is
consequently, One can see the spread of infections in the elderly, which is a direct consequence of the high level of infection in the community. The English approach to the protection of the old ones have failed, due to the high level of infection in the community, and the lack of a realistic plan for how older people could be protected from being infected with any such disease transmission in the community.

the Actor.

READ MORE: It’s enough for now – set aside a Tegnell, and Hallengren, LEARN MORE: , My dad didn’t care during the slow, to the point of death. READ MORE: Three of the crucial mistakes made by the FolkhälsomyndighetenHjärnforskaren: 7 tips for dealing with coronakrisen