“National security comes before Teliaförsäljning”

“the line from the Conservatives on the sale of Telia”

“This is an opinion piece. It is the writer who stands for the views that are put forward in the text, not Against.”

“REPLICA. Niklas Karlsson and Helene Hellmark Knutsson (S) want to make it appear that the Conservatives motif to a sale of Telia would be purely ideological. The lack of coverage in reality. “

“There are two clear reasons that the government should investigate the possibility of divesting its holdings in Telia.”

“first, Telia’s purchase of Bonnier Broadcasting with TV4 in the portfolio that the state would have a dominant role in the media market. “

“the Conservatives are highly critical of this and that the government has shown a remarkable passivity and lack of control in this matter.”

“For the second, it is not an optimal long-term solution to the state, in its capacity as a minority shareholder in Telia, does not have full right of disposition over the security-sensitive system and infrastructure that exist in the company. “

“Therefore, we want to investigate the conditions for the state, in exchange for its commercial ownership, has full control over these security-sensitive systems.”

“the social democrats writes that the armed forces do not support a sale. But they refer to the investigation, as the defence ran in 2008 and where the issue is purely a pure sales – not the exchange that the parliament has now requested that the government investigate.”

“For us it is obvious that national security comes before everything else. We have been very clear that we will never stand behind a sale if not 100% security can be guaranteed. “

“instead of spreading a false image of security aspects would be subordinate to the Conservatives should the democrats devote themselves to solving the real problems.”

“nCarl-Oskar Bohlin, chairman of the industry (M)nBeatrice Ask, the defence policy spokesperson (M)”

“n Join in the debate and comment on the artikelnn – like Aftonbladet Debate on Facebook.”

“the Article is a replica. Read the full the debate here – ”