The official explanation and the general perception is that the coronavirus for the first time it was discovered in the chinese city of Wuhan in december 2019.
But a series of mysterious images and a study of these wounds now doubt the fact.
It writes the ABC News, where images can also be seen.
the Images come from a satellite, which has focused on the five hospitals in Wuhan. They are now landed with a group of researchers at Harvard Medical School who has studied the pictures carefully.
And the conclusion is clear. Coronaviruses may have hit the city in august.
the Reason for the conclusion is that scientists have discovered a worrying high level of activity in front of the five hospitals.
An example of this is a comparison of the number of cars in the parking lot in front of the Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University. 10 October 2018, there were 506 cars parked at the hospital, while the 640 was present the year after. The image repeats itself also at the other hospitals in the city.
– We have observed a dramatic increase in traffic in front of the big five hospitals in Wuhan, which began in the late summer and early autumn of 2019, says Dr. John Brownstein from Harvard Medical School, to ABC News.
The researchers have coupled together with a remarkable increase of searches on corona virus-symptoms on the chinese internet.
3. June, news agency AP present revealing internal documents, that shows a completely different story.
Here was, among other things, that China deliberately waited more than a week to publish the genetic makeup of the coronavirus.
And it came to pass, supposedly only because an independent laboratory selected to publish the genetic code of a website without the authorities ‘ acceptance.
in Addition, China has been waiting for at least 14 days to give the world health organisation (WHO) detailed information on the patients and smittetilfælde in January. All because there was tight control and internal competition in the chinese health authorities.
the Article continues under the picture …
Director general of the WHO, Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus. Photo: Ritzau Scanpix
Internally it created great frustration among the employees in the WHO.
– We go forward with very little information. It is clearly not enough to make a good planning, writes Maria Van Kerkhove, who today is the technical leader for the management of coronavirus in the world health organisation.
The american news has tried to get a comment to the case of the WHO, but they will say nothing unless they see the AP’s documents. It may not be possible, since the AP will thus compromise their source.
Although it may seem mysterious that the WHO outwardly praises China, when they internally criticize them, so there may be a good explanation.
reportedly tried WHO to stay good friends with China, so the forward could maintain a good cooperation. All together help the world to deal with corona virus in the best way possible.
WHO is in fact dependent on the member states from cooperating, since they do not have the power to examine health conditions in the various countries.
In its daily press briefing Wednesday, announced the Trump, that the UNITED states would withdraw aid to the WHO. Lars Græsborg Mathiesen from Kongressen.com makes you smarter here. Video: Ritzau Scanpix.
China’s and the WHO’s handling of the coronavirus have several times gotten Donald Trump to see red.
Among other things, he has written a letter in which he accuses the WHO to ‘lack independence from China’, as the president believes, have too much influence on the organization.
Donald Trump lists in the letter no less than 18 specific examples, where he clarifies his point.
It is, among other things, that China’s hidden the truth about virusudbruddet in Wuhan without consequences from the WHO’, and ‘not to allow an international investigation of the outbreak in China’.
29. may inform he that the UNITED states withdraw from its cooperation with the WHO and will continue to use the money other places.
But according to the AP hills, the new information is not up on Donald Trumps the interpretation of the case. They tell, on the contrary, China also withheld information from the WHO.