the Background to this criticism is an event in the autumn of 2017. A person who then had applied for an advertised temporary positions got word that the recruitment process is interrupted, when the theater is done instead is a reorganization of the current department.
the performance of the service requested months of following out all the public documents in the interrupted anställningsärendet, but then got the news that the documents had not been saved. This is in contrast to the premise that the documents would have been preserved in the archive.
WELL now, after a review of the case, that the company lacked support to avoid the application dossier at the relevant time. It also makes a general statement, and writes that ”the suspicion that the hiring decisions in the public sector are made on unwarranted grounds liable to undermine the public confidence in the public business”. The statement continues:
”the Principle of public access, thus fulfils an important function in such cases. To a anställningsärende interrupted does not mean that the interest of the transparency falls away.”
