It couldn’t get any sitter, but I thought it may resolve itself. This is of course Sweden, children are always welcome. I went away with the kids, stroller and barnattiraljer, and when Witt-Brattström had spoken in the ten minutes I had to go out. My daughter’s whimpering led to loud calls from the audience that we would remove us.
because I very much had wanted to listen to the lecture. But I knew aunt in the audience.
If a child disrupts a lecture, you go out. It is not any more with the matter.
In the summer I would meet some friends from Finland on the town in Moscow. I came straight from work and had my 3.5 kg heavy dog with me.
To our meeting place I had designated Moscow’s best outdoor dining on the Strelka, with beautiful views of the moskva river. I definitely wanted to be there. It was sunny and nice and each and every other restaurant in Moscow are run by people with dogs in your lap.
But this restaurant didn’t allow dogs. It didn’t help how I argued. (We are out there! The dog is minimal! Etc.)
so difficult to accept the limitations are there for everyone’s best but just in our case, this means that you’ll have to think about a bit?
I thought of this after Pia Ingström in Hufvudstadsbladet wrote a column about what she calls the ubiquity of dog owners. She believes that allergikers health should be given priority over dogs, is the right to visit a library.
It should not be controversial. But in the social media reacted to the many dog owners to count up the experiences of how horrible it feels to be rejected.
Myself, I also felt duly humbled when I trudged home from the lecture with my baby. I was annoyed when I sat with the dog and friends on a bench outside the restaurant.
But it was just an experience. An understanding of how it pays not to do.
properties that do not at all are held in high esteem in the western world in 2019. One of them is a certain stoiskhet.
If someone observes that even the children bothers you, you should listen to music with headphones on the train or that you can not have with their dogs everywhere, you can choose to respond with a: Wow, I had not thought of. I take the child in his arms/put on my headphones/going out with the dog.
You can also respond with one: HOW CAN PEOPLE BE SO MEAN TO LITTLE ME GUESS IF I’m going to WRITE A POST ON FACEBOOK.
But should you be not able to restrain themselves afterwards? You have to nurture their angry feelings so tenderly?
I don’t think people are upset over the rule. They are upset over the unpleasant feeling of not having thought after.
I, myself, assumed that children are always welcome everywhere that time on the ABF? Because I wanted to listen to the lecture. I gave priority to my own interests. So people do often. We are good at finding good excuses for our children and dogs is not a problem.
A proposal to all who think that the world should show greater understanding of my priorities: to Try to do the opposite. It is surprising what själsfrid it provides that instead of getting at the jews say: Absolutely. And then you go out with her screaming child and continue their life without a lot of emotion.
I’m not saying that all complaints from the world around us is motivated. For example, my neighbor barking all the time at our family because we have a common hallway, as a child, a dog, and I striding through many times per day. We pull in dust and dirt from the street. The neighbor requires that we clean every time we go out.
I think that the requirement that a lobby should look like a ballroom is unrealistic. But I quarrel not with your neighbor. I sweep up after us as often as I can.
the Neighbor believes that I clean for are rarely. But at least I try to, and she sees it. So we are friends.