After the indictment of the judge in the case master, Cristina Cifuentes maintains its version, according to sources close to the former president. “Nor ordered anyone the making of any falsehood, nor pressured to be missing to the truth in a transcript”, underlines his attorney in a brief filed last November 15, to which has had access to THE COUNTRY and that, according to sources from the defense, the judge still has not resolved.
MORE INFORMATION
The judge in the ‘case master’ is processed by Cristina Cifuentes Story of a picture: thus fell the dome of the PP, The prosecutor is not seen proven that the brain ‘master’ ordered to approve Cifuentes
The magistrate Carmen Rodríguez-Medel stresses that, after jumping the scandal, the exdirigente popular gave instructions to one of their advisers so that it should urge the brain of the plot, Enrique Álvarez Conde, to “create” the act of the working end of master (TFM) that the ex-leader of the PP of Madrid, he studied at the Universidad Rey Juan Carlos (URJC). Despite this, Cifuentes says, “there is no target element and a certain to pay the out-of-focus thesis the participation in a false documentary”.
“This representation remains Betebet unknown whether the act [TFM] existed and, after lost, is reconstructed in a form faithful to the one who says that was”, continues the lawyer of the former president, who argues that the teacher, Cecilia Rosado, who forged the act, “release in full” to the exjefa of the regional government of “the realization and elaboration of the document”: “on The 21st of march 2018 [when the scandal blows], Pink not spoke with Cristina Cifuentes”.
A version that contrasts with the findings of Rodríguez-Medel, proprietor of the Court of Instruction number 51 of Madrid: “The only reason that Teresa Feito, a consultant to the former president, was in the rey juan carlos on the 21st of march, in the full maelstrom of the crisis by the publication of the news, it was because he was following instructions from Cifuentes to perform the acts which are necessary to facilitate a solution that would not undermine their interests.”
The defense of Cifuentes asked the judge in its letter of 15 November that archivase the open case against him for forgery, as it did with the main line of investigation after the Supreme Court’s opinion that rejected attributed to Pablo Casado, leader of the PP.
