I recently read on Facebook that “islam is an ideology that requires submission, is it enough to follow the teachings of islam in an area, there is no longer room for moderates or secular muslims. There will not be room for atheists, christians, jews or other religions”.
Sharam Alghasi. Show more
In this statement is launched for the first islam as an imminent danger to the Norwegian society, and for the other is conveyed implicitly a warning against immigrasjonsbølgen to the western world, and Norway; that they, read muslims come in large numbers and from all sides, sneak into our society, to take over, to “snikislamisere” our country.
This narrative is a dominant story in a dark blue way of thinking about islam and immigration in today’s Norway. Unfortunately suffers from the narrative of historieløshet. This story, based on an imagined enemy that is threatening “our values”, has time and again proven to be historically fatal consequences for the mankind. An alternative narrative of violent islam and massive immigration, must thus relate to the story of how realities is .
The time the situation in many countries, that we can easily categorize as “muslim country”, stood in stark contrast to the current situation, there was no massive flight to the west, nor was it the dominant islamist forces in these countries.
Muhammad-the affair: A dangerous judgment about the blasphemy Leader
the Story of a radical and extremist form of islam in the muslim world goes far back in time, but it also makes the story of a force for modernity and secularism. The political and sociocultural landscape in many muslim countries , as early as from the mid-1800s to the beginning of the 1970s, reveals a significant struggle between the secular and religiøskonservative powers. Nationalist movements that panarabisme and arab nationalism in countries such as Egypt, Syria or Iraq, kemalisme in Turkey, or the iranian nationalism, fought against religious fanaticism, and promoted instead the modern and secular values.
the Result was secular governance in many muslim countries, characterised by including radical improvement of women’s position, and a unique kulturproduksjon in the field of literature, film, and music.
Islam, as a political ideology, had limited influence in the political process. There was no trace of the suicide bombers or moralvoktere who checked on how the people practiced their religion. Islam belonged for the most part the private sphere.
Innovation of the islam Debate
Saudi Arabia, however, was the exception, where the country’s state religion, wahhabisme, stood, and stands for a reactionary and extremist form of islam, the hallmark of a very orthodox interpretation of the Qur’an.
Wahhabisme, however, had never seen the light of day if it were not for the massive support from the kolonimakter, with the united Kingdom in the lead.
the Same wahhabisme, in close alliance with the united STATES, have since the 1970s played a fatal role in establishing the islam to a globalpolitisk power factor. When Afghanistan was invaded by sovjetstyrker in 1979, was it just the saudi wahhabistene that was the american’s foremost allies in the ideological, economic and military organization of the parts of the war against the soviet forces in the country.
the united STATES also gave its support to general Zia ul Haq when he in 1978, through a coup d’état, took over power in Pakistan. He conducted sharialover in the country, and was loyal ally of the united STATES in the war against the soviet occupation of Afghanistan.
Slow reform in Saudi Arabia
Next the saudi Wahhabismen, the islamist tenets of the iranian regime played a central role in promoting a fanatical political islam on the world. Today is an extensive contact between the americans and the ayatollaene before the latter’s government takeover in 1979, is well documented. The americans gave their blessing for ayatollaenes government takeover, and in return, they could ensure the least possible turmoil in the oil market, and a distance to the soviet neighbouring in the north.
The dark, religiøsfanatiske spirit, the spirit of the secular powers in the muslim world a time sent back in aladdin’s oil lamp, was in process of taken out. In this process were the united STATES and its allies, instrumental in supporting a reactionary and violent islamist ideology on the geopolitical and geokulturelle the world map. A few decades later supports or attacks the united STATES and its allies, arvtakere of the same ideology as what it pays for them.
country after Country that does not complies with americans ‘ interests are sanctioned, attacked, and literally laid in ruins. Leaders in those countries, to the demons, and the population should “be reclaimed” from the tyrants. Such was the case in Iraq, Libya and Syria. Iran is next. It was good with ayatollaene in 1979, but now they are the same ayatollaene danger for peace on earth. While the countries that are the american puppets in the islamic world , such as Saudi Arabia, neither sanksjoneres or be attacked for terrorism, for the lack of human rights or for the development of weapons of mass destruction.
Sanctions bite in Iran Comment
This story about the west’s role in the political dynamics in the middle East is mostly absent in our contemporary debate about the rise of radical islam and migrasjonskrisen. This interaction should, however, provide good reasons for reflection.
For the first, traditional kolonimakter and american geopolitical interests had great significance for the rise of islamist extremism as a formidable political ideology in the islamic world .
For the second, have the historical support for islamist extremism, led to a radical weakening of the national and progressive alternatives in many countries in the middle East. The radical form of islam has created difficult circumstances for alternative thinkers in the middle East.
Radical anarchist and admirer of Islam – meet the unknown Knut Hamsun Dagbladet Plus
And for the third, have ekstremistenes hegemony in the islamic world , the absence of progressive alternatives, and the strategic destabilization of the country after country, led to massive emigration and escape.
the Norwegian blue the thinking is that immigrants from the islamic world, muslims , seen as potential extremists. In reality, the travel of immigrants to the west either to commit terror or introduce Sharialover. In reality they’re on the run from the conditions that the defenders of the “opplysningsidealer”, “democracy” and “freedom of speech” has been complicit in creating.
