Erna Solberg has faced massive and merciless criticism for having given Kjell Britain Ropstad and Better acceptance when it comes to abortion and biotechnology. It has been earned. Solberg has given an extreme abortparti, who is against abortion on demand, the decisive influence in questions about women’s reproductive health.

It is almost as you need to rub you in the eyes, but it did well Better-more also when they received the offer from Erna. They have not had such influence since the abortloven was adopted, with the exception of a short period of time with the KrF leader Dagfinn Høybråten as health minister. He boasted of having introduced Europe’s most stringent bioteklov. The celebration was short-lived, and pride stood for the fall. The law was quickly liberalisert again, and then after huge protests, not least from the academic community.

Now protesting the scientists again towards a knowledge-based government. They say it is pointless to put the medical development on hold for 2 1/2 years.

I thought the elected had learned of this experiment to let His turn time back. It made the KrF and chose a new leader with a more modern packaging and approach. Until now.

the Government Solberg and supporters have no good answers to the criticism, other than that the critics protesting in the wrong way, the wrong tone, and should talk about something else. Some have also tried with the detailed depictions of how fosterreduksjon be performed, in the belief that it will arouse discomfort enough to turn public opinion. It is a means only abortmotstandere tend to use.

And it has given a grunnløst the hope that the resistance against fosterreduksjon is greater than against abortion on demand. Perhaps even a majority, have the most hopeful prediction.

No, it is actually completely wrong. There is a solid majority against the government’s proposed restriction. Around 68 per cent say no to the change, only 19 percent support it, according to the Ipsos measurement for the Newspaper.

Not in any other party than the christian democratic party has is it near a majority. The resistance is greatest among the present coalition voters, but not among their own voters meets Erna Solberg particular understanding.

the Figures show that all the evidence that the government’s policy in this area is starkly out of tune with the will of the people, and the resistance is high, regardless of gender, age, geography and political preference. It is difficult to get on a political decision where a government has been more in step with voters on the national level.

Erna Solberg was prepared in trouble, but must have meant it was worth to stand in the storm to get the Sector into the government. That change is the result of a cynical political game, makes the unlikely voters milder tune.

But will it blow over? Norwegian voters who accepts a rule, political compromise, but it is of course a limit to control across a massive majority in the population. And the border are too many to be reached when a small christian party residing under the threshold, given the decisive influence in a question about women’s rights and health. A party that has been a historical sort of bottleneck when it comes to gender equality. It is simply a mockery towards those who have taken the fight.

Make sure your mouth when you’re talking to the establishment, has been the answer on the engagement we have seen over the last few days. Do not use those words, not protests on the way, don’t be so loud. No one who has listened to such warnings, ‘ve got the world on. The rights to be walked on is not given to us by the government. They are fought for and created by the most people. And we can take them back.