Dagbladet seems to possibly that the net wealth tax is appropriate with respect to the fordelingseffekter. The truth is that the net wealth tax can be, and is, in many ways, a discriminatory tax, then neither the state or foreign owners affected by this tax.
None of our neighbors have tax on working capital, and no other country in Europe. In Germany, it is laid down in the constitution.
the Government has two years Debate
In Norway have one more smaller companies, f.ex. family firms. Runs the business with a deficit a year, yet the net wealth tax to be paid. It may result in the termination or non-renew production equipment. Gahr Støre said for some time back: If the company gets a problem with paying the net wealth tax, yes, so have the owners a problem. I believe it is the community that has a problem when a company, who might otherwise have life right, is closed down because of it. Norway has many smaller businesses, important jobs in the entire country, which is often exposed to large fluctuations. No reason to weaken these.
net wealth tax can quickly be konfiskatorisk. It is one of the reasons that it is abolished in other countries. In addition, it leads to the treasure to a huge outflow of capital. It has the Uk bad experience with. Had the country’s finances not been so solid had the politicians possibly have had to think differently.
‘ve lost 660 million since 2015 – still need to pay capital tax
Tax on dividend is increased significantly, closer to 32 %, and the average tax rate should go down to 22 %. Norway still has a relatively high company taxation in relation to the countries we should compare ourselves with.
My suggestion is that arveskatten being reintroduced in certain level, in order to regain the losing of skatteproveny to remove tax on working capital. Inheritance can be said to be free means to not be reckoned with. The transition of the values triggers the otherwise often tax.
