IN SVT:s ”Agenda” on Sunday evenings, was interviewed Norlén, which in conjunction with the riksmötets opening up, was elected a new president. He held not back his disappointment that the parliamentary parties have failed to get to a solution in the question, even if he himself did not want to use the word ”disappointment”.
– However, I have said that I am surprised that we have not come further in the parties ‘ assessments of the positionsförflyttningar, than what we have done so far. I thought we would have solved the regeringsfrågan at this point, ” he said in the interview.
the third statsministeromröstning – of a maximum of four – can come to fruition before christmas.
– At the beginning of next week I’ll provide information on the way forward. There are two statsministeromröstningar.
– If there is to be a vote on Friday, the proposal must be added formally to the plenary later on Wednesday. So there is not much time to wave at, said Andreas Norlén.
His ambition is to regeringsfrågan should be able to be resolved in round three, the closest to follow.
” we’ve Now had two rounds of voting where, in principle, have been able to say in advance that they will fail. The aim then has been to finish a sub-process, and then bring the process to formally forward.
but put it not so bluntly, but said, in the ”Agenda”:
– Now, I would like to see the third vote is done with a candidate who has the potential to be chosen, and that we thus avoid a fourth vote, which would be incredibly emotive, and dramatic. For then we are the, so to speak, at the pit, or in each case in front of an extra option.
On the question of both a third and a fourth round fail and then extravalsprocessen can be simplified for voters, parties, and authorities, by adding the EUROPEAN elections and extravalet on the same day, 26 may, said the 45-year-old president of the avoidance:
” I think it will be hard, it would mean that the fourth statsministeromröstningen of formal reasons must be delayed to February 26.
such a manoeuvre would be perceived by both the riksdag and the Swedish people as the so senfärdig that it simply would be rejected. He added that there are ”400 million reasons to avoid an extra option”, with reference to the estimated cost of such.
