New legal setback for the strict immigration policy of U.S. President Donald Trump: A Federal judge from California has to apply collected on Monday (local time), an arrangement of Trumps government for the Return of Asylum to Mexico. Judge Richard Seeborg said that the US government could not guarantee that in Mexico the protection of “life and liberty” of the people Concerned. Trump reacted angrily to the decision.
Trumps government had announced in December to send asylum-seekers from Central American countries, on the border to Mexico for asylum for the duration of their asylum procedure back to Mexico.
the measure was Implemented as of January first at the border crossing of San Ysidro, California and, later, in the Californian city of Calexico and in the Texan El Paso. The outgoing Secretary of Homeland security Kirstjen Nielsen had announced a few days ago, an expansion of the program.
Washington argued, 90 per cent of asylum applications were ultimately rejected by judges. Many asylum seekers would, however, diving during the often lengthy process in the United States. Critics argued, however, that in Mexico, the imminent threat of the refugees. In the insecure Mexican border region, refugees were tortured, murdered and raped.
The citizens complained rights movement, the ACLU and several other organizations had in the name of eleven asylum seekers from El Salvador, Honduras and Guatemala, which were rejected at U.S. border crossings and back to Mexico sent against the measure.
In his 27-page judgment Richgter Seeberg made it clear that it is not a question of whether the measure is “useful, intelligent, or people to be worthy”. It is only a question of whether foreigners are “excessively dangerous circumstances,” be exposed to. This is from his point of view.
“So unfair”
The decision Friday. The US government may appeal but appeal. Trump criticized the decision in the online service Twitter in focus. The judges have decided that “Mexico is too dangerous for migrants,” wrote Trump. This was for the United States, “so unfair”. The situation was “out of control”. Of civil rights, the judgment was welcomed learning about it. Trumps government could not simply ignore the applicable laws, to people from an asylum to hold the request in the United States, said Judy Rabinowitz of the ACLU.
A 9th Circuit Judge just ruled that Mexico is too dangerous for migrants. So unfair to the U. s. OUT OF CONTROL! https://t.co/XF8o3jMDle
— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) 9. April 2019
The containment of illegal immigration is one of the key themes of trump’s presidency. His plans for the construction of a wall on the border to Mexico in the months of fierce political dispute. Only recently he threatened Mexico with a closure of the border.
Another defeat for Trump
in Front of the US courts has Trump suffered with his immigration policies, a number of setbacks. In December, a judge from Washington had conceded about the decision, victims of domestic violence and gang crime from asylum right to exclude.
Also Trumps-entry ban for people from Muslim-majority countries, which he had arranged shortly after his inauguration in January 2017, had been blocked by the U.S. Department of justice several times before the final version was finally approved by the Supreme court. (aru/sda)
Created: 09.04.2019, 12:17 PM
