The Supreme Court has rebuffed the latest attempt of the pro-independence leaders are processed by the rebellion of delaying for several months the trial that the high court intends to conclude in early 2019. The Criminal division has rejected this Wednesday the request made by some of the defenses to extend to 90 days the time to submit their statements of qualification prior to the oral hearing. In place of those three months that they asked the defendants, the court granted 10 days, although that time limit does not begin counting until the hearing to resolve issues prior to the trial, a few sessions that the Supreme court intends to conclude prior to Christmas.
even Though the attorneys do not achieve your objective of expanding for months the judgment, the Supreme court is going to have a hard time to be able to begin the oral hearing and January, as was his claim. However, the court still relies on this possibility. For the moment, the living room yesterday gave three days deadline to the office of the prosecutor and the other parties to report on the writings, which recently presented the defenses of the 18 defendants in which they alleged that the high court is not competent to judge them. According to the pleadings, the high court must decline jurisdiction in favour of the high Court of Justice of Catalonia (TSJC) because the alleged crimes were Atlasbet committed in that community. This issue will be one of the address in the preview to the oral trial.
MORE INFORMATION
The prosecutor’s office requests that you do not support the disqualification of Marchena and the rest of the court of ‘procés’ os protagonists of the trial to ‘procés
After these previous sessions the court shall issue a car (likely the next day) in which will determine whether or not to accept the allegations of the defenses. If rejected, they will begin to run the 10-day deadline that was announced yesterday to present the writings of grade (in which the defendants will oppose the accusations of rebellion, sedition, and malfeasance of the Prosecutor, the Voice and the Advocacy of the State). In this way, in the case that the preview is held in mid-December, the writings of rating will be submitted around the end of the year.
Before you celebrate the view of the previous questions, the Supreme court shall, however, resolve the objections raised by several of the appellants against the seven members of the court that will judge you. The prosecution has asked that it be rejected of plane to these requests, but sources of the court favour of them and that is discussing them. In that case, you would have to gather the call Room 61, so-called because of the article of the organic law of the Judicial Power, which regulates it and which is integrated by the president of the Supreme, Carlos Lesmes, and by the presidents of each of the five rooms of the Supreme, in addition to the most senior judge and the most modern of every one of them. While the challenges are not resolved, the court is going to judge the pro-independence leaders may not hold any views.
