Lennart and Niklas Ekdal got the criticism that they cut off their guests a bit too often in his first program, especially the female. Personally I found the ”God be the price” for the few that don’t allow GP’s political editor Alice Teodorescu grind on as a 78-varvare. Is there any single program on politics and society not necessarily invite her?

What is she saying that is so interesting and exciting? New it is not, you know exactly what she’ll say. She is, of course, often quite dramatically passive aggressive – and it is one of her better qualities as a commentator. She is sharp and småspydig and easy superior. I appreciate the clarity. But perhaps feeling the viewers some variety?

if that samtalstonen is so hard and tough, yes on twitter and social media, where you can in peace and quiet to lie and prickskjuta game. It gets a headline or two. Moderaten Hanif Bali can cross all borders, receives criticism from all sides – he has never before been such a sought-after tv guest now?

It pays to cross borders. It will not be before he is sitting in the ”Ekdal and Ekdal” and spreads out. In the public service is the tone right is often namby-pamby, and I think rarely it gets really hot in the debate.

the Editors will probably want to be sure that the guests deliver, and when it is given with the obvious maps. I understand them, but it’s not so little unimaginative.

Lennart Ekdal has discontinued their intervjuoffer throughout his career, when he broke forth on TV4 soon to be a lifetime ago, it was precisely the persistence and the stubbornness that you enjoyed the most. He did not, and he is still pretty tough – it is also his best feature.

the right timing, SVT has lacked this type of program that digs down in both issues of substance and ideas, and there is nothing wrong with cousins from the county of Östergötland. They complement each other very well, I think they can be put securely with impressions once they become warmer in the clothes. Lennart is a bit crazy and gapigare, like studioljuset that puts him in the center, Niklas may be just the cousin from Kisa, but is in the conversation sharper and smarter to the style.

They’ll probably still fit for grabbigheten. Of course it is a bit of fun with ”the cousins”, Ekdal and Ekdal, and you stand to playing squash in the programme’s trailer, but see like I said up in the hills. It is a little fun one time, maybe two, but to continue the grinding in the ”guys” brand of the viewers, they are putting their own seriousness and credibility – are at stake.

in Addition, there will be straight of the easy silly.

It is perhaps also a bit too many guests on the menu, it becomes absolutely necessary to cancel and let everyone get their minutes – but it is rather useless to invite such as Lena Andersson and don’t let her say what she came there for. To the end also sits on the guests and groping, and it ends with Lennart Ekdal ask if they have any one-liner as the summary. No, not a good summary, and Lennart Ekdals ”fun” interview with studiopubliken we can be absolutely free in the future. He wouldn’t be the political journalism Ingvar Oldsberg?

Jimmie Åkesson and he did not like in the past to defend themselves a second. Anna Hedenmo bent almost down to the floor when she got into the conversation on the enormous importance he received in the Swedish politics. Åkesson ferments.

Imagine what the years go by.