Both the WWF and the Liberal party Guri Melby has had good posts about the wolf in the Newspaper, but in the Melbys post deserves this answer: “When the government recently said no to rovviltnemndene they got furious reactions from both sides as both notified demonstrations. How did we get here?”
Siri Martinsen. Show more
Reactions that is referred consists among other things of that NOAH has gone to court to stop the ulvejakten. And one demonstration, it appears, is The selection for the wolf 12. January – where both the WWF and Melby are invited.
NOAH does not consider a selection for the critically endangered animals as a “furious” reaction – but an adequate reaction to a policy that now separates Norway as one of the countries that take the least care of endangered animals. We wish that Norway shall not drive a politics that has as its premise that wild animals remain threatened. Is it controversial?
Warns against hestehandel about the wolf – That I find myself not in the
There is something wrong when a modest desire that no animals shall be required to be critically endangered in Norway, is seen as “one page”. This should in the reasonable name be all parties ‘ standards policy. You are in today as far out on the utryddingspolitikkens court, that it to promote naturmangfoldlovens principle is seen as “a side” – despite the fact that the majority of the population supports the understanding that the animals shall not be threatened.
Tried to stop controversial hunting – in less than two hours were two wolves shot
the Media has in years, of the reasons they need to explain yourself, given the larger rooms to those who dislike the predators than those who like or think it is unproblematic with a rich nature. At the same time don’t dare our politicians put næringsinteressene in place when they are pushing on to get precedence over the protection of threatened nature.
For ulvens part, it is now commercial jaktinteresser threatens it the most. For even though the losses on pasture goes down due to preventive measures, it will always be able to oppdrives a hunter who believes he has førsterett to walking in nature at the expense of wild animals. Politicians that take biodiversity seriously, must dare to make a settlement with these attitudes. They must dare to stand on nature’s side.
Yes, the wolf has a nyttefunksjon! Debate
currently held the wolf down to a level where it is doomed to a status as critically endangered. The reasons to shoot endangered animals is steadily declining – now is ukvantifisert reluctance enough. And other measures for the konfliktdemping than shooting (which on the contrary is not conflict-dampening), are not even examined by the ministry.
Why has NOAH gone to the right. And therefore, we invite all who care about wild animals, to the selection 12. January.
