In the eyes of the SVP the framework agreement with the EU, a “disclosure of Switzerland”. It is direct democracy out of the cave, to disregard the Swiss independence, neutrality and federalism and hazardous to the welfare in the country.
no, the SVP-institutional agreement (Insta) or framework agreement is known. On Monday, it published its response to the consultation of the Federal Council. In 15 points of the SVP, which is why the draft needs to be rejected, in their view, to the EU. The agreement will lead Switzerland insidiously in the EU.
“Existential violations” against the Constitution
A signature would be in the words of the SVP “state politically reprehensible”, in particular due to the obligation to dynamic legal adoption and the Adoption of EU-Jurisdiction. Both were “existential violations” against the Constitution. The legal certainty with the framework agreement, greater, the SVP does not apply. Switzerland would deliver regulation in the EU, and it was unsafe, what must you assume in the future, she writes. The weakening of the legal security of solid.
The Swiss legislation with regard to legal certainty is much more reliable than the EU, argues the SVP. Regulations from Brussels, which made no sense, it should not be assumed.
The SVP is more to bear in mind that with the Insta economic policy, transport policy, agriculture policy, immigration and labour market regulation, as well as the access to social insurance, “in essential Parts would be determined solely by the EU” for Switzerland. “This is untenable.”
Expansion of the free movement of persons
Once more, the SVP of bilateral relations advocates, and in the mutual interest and agreement negotiated contracts. The framework agreement precludes this route by the EU’s legal for Switzerland, and Switzerland would have to adopt this law.
A framework Treaty would enhance the free movement of persons, contrary to the in February 2014 at the ballot box, adopted articles of the Constitution, according to which Switzerland shall control the immigration. The EU wants to eliminate the wage protection measures in Switzerland and close a Takeover of the Union citizens Directive is not, what to speak of the negotiating mandate of the Federal Council expressly.
A contradiction, the SVP also provides for their deportation initiative, going back to the constitutional article for the Deportation of criminal foreigners. With the framework agreement convicts could no longer be purchased from the EU, warns you.
As unacceptable, the SVP is known about the Bilateral agreements I and beyond the guillotine clauses. And the prohibition of state aid would be federalism and the autonomy of cantons and municipalities is undermined. Would be taken, for example, economic development, investment in water, power, or state guarantees for cantonal banks.
Bilateral
set The SVP calls for a continuation of the tried-and-tested Swiss economic policy and relations to all the countries in the world are based on reciprocity. By the Federal Council, it calls for a plan of action for the case that the EU is Switzerland imposes increased after a ‘ no ‘ to the agreement “economic retaliatory measure”.
The SVP is the last of the four parties on the Federal Council, which has published its opinion on the framework agreement officially. The SP, which was reflected last Friday, has no established stance and a lot of open questions.
The CVP aims to ensure the inclusion of people, Parliament and the cantons in the case of adoption of Law, and demands that the Federal Council submits to the Parliament with the Insta approval and implementation of law. The FDP asks for clarifications, but says Yes to the agreement. (fal/sda)
Created: 01.04.2019, 16:58 PM